Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28449713›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2017

Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, VMAT, fixed-field IMRT and 3D-conformal radiotherapy for stage I-II nasal natural killer T-cell lymphoma.

Xianfeng Liu, Erliang Huang, Ying Wang, Yanan He, Huanli Luo, Mingsong Zhong, Da Qiu, Chao Li, Han Yang, Guanglei He and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. [How I diagnose and treat NK/T cell lymphoma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xianfeng LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Erliang HuangDepartment of Medical Equipment Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou, 510623, People's Republic of China.
Ying WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Yanan HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Huanli LuoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Mingsong ZhongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Da QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Chao LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Han YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Guanglei HeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China.
Juan ZhouForensic Identification Center, College of Criminal Investigation, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Fu JinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chongqing Cancer Institute & Hospital & Cancer Center, Shapingba District, Chongqing, 400030, China. jfazj@126.com.
Chongqing Cancer Hospital · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNSouthwest University of Political Science & Law · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare radiotherapy plans for Stage I-II nasal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NNKTL) using helical tomotherapy (HT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), Fixed-Field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).

methodsEight patents with Stage I-II NNKTL treated with IMRT were re-planned for HT, VMAT (two full arcs), and 3D-CRT. The quality of target coverage, the exposure of normal tissue and the efficiency of radiation delivery were analyzed.

resultsHT showed significant improvement over IMRT in terms of D

conclusionThe unexpected results show that both HT and VMAT can achieve higher conformal treatment plans while getting worse organs at risk (OARs) sparing than IMRT for patients with Stage I-II NNKTL. VMAT requires the shortest delivery time, and IMRT delivers the lowest dose to most OARs. The results could provide guidance for selecting proper radiation technologies for different cases.

Indexed as

HumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLymphoma, Extranodal NK-T-CellNeoplasm StagingNose NeoplasmsOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedDosimetryHelical tomotherapyIMRTNasal natural killer/T-cell lymphomaVMAT

Identifiers

PMID28449713
PMCPMC5408431
OpenAlexW2608653327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.