ArticleBMC genomics2017
Inter- and intra-species variation in genome-wide gene expression of Drosophila in response to parasitoid wasp attack.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Priming for protection: inducible attachment-resistance to ectoparasitic mites inParasitology · 2025Article
- Glucocerebrosidase deficiency leads to neuropathology via cellular immune activation.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Glucocerebrosidase deficiency leads to neuropathology via cellular immune activation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Natural selection has driven the recurrent loss of an immunity gene that protectsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Article
- Host Transcriptome Analysis ofInsects · 2023Article
- Trans-regulatory changes underpin the evolution of the Drosophila immune response.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Differential activation of JAK-STAT signaling reveals functional compartmentalization ineLife · 2021Article
- DoesPeerJ · 2021Article
- Article
- Constitutive activation of cellular immunity underlies the evolution of resistance to infection ineLife · 2020Article
- Interactions with ectoparasitic mites induce host metabolic and immune responses in flies at the expense of reproduction-associated factors.Parasitology · 2020Article
- Long-Read Genome Sequencing and Assembly ofG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Article
- Natural and Artificial Selection for Parasitoid Resistance inFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Regulatory and sequence evolution in response to selection for improved associative learning ability in Nasonia vitripennis.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Supervised machine learning reveals introgressed loci in the genomes of Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- Genomes of the Hymenoptera.Current opinion in insect science · 2018Review
- Transcriptomic Analysis of Octanoic Acid Response inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParasitoid resistance in Drosophila varies considerably, among and within species. An immune response, lamellocyte-mediated encapsulation, evolved in a subclade of Drosophila and was subsequently lost in at least one species within this subclade. While the mechanisms of resistance are fairly well documented in D. melanogaster, much less is known for closely related species. Here, we studied the inter- and intra-species variation in gene expression after parasitoid attack in Drosophila. We used RNA-seq after parasitization of four closely related Drosophila species of the melanogaster subgroup and replicated lines of D. melanogaster experimentally selected for increased resistance to gain insights into short- and long-term evolutionary changes.
resultsWe found a core set of genes that are consistently up-regulated after parasitoid attack in the species and lines tested, regardless of their level of resistance. Another set of genes showed no up-regulation or expression in D. sechellia, the species unable to raise an immune response against parasitoids. This set consists largely of genes that are lineage-restricted to the melanogaster subgroup. Artificially selected lines did not show significant differences in gene expression with respect to non-selected lines in their responses to parasitoid attack, but several genes showed differential exon usage.
conclusionsWe showed substantial similarities, but also notable differences, in the transcriptional responses to parasitoid attack among four closely related Drosophila species. In contrast, within D. melanogaster, the responses were remarkably similar. We confirmed that in the short-term, selection does not act on a pre-activation of the immune response. Instead it may target alternative mechanisms such as differential exon usage. In the long-term, we found support for the hypothesis that the ability to immunologically resist parasitoid attack is contingent on new genes that are restricted to the melanogaster subgroup.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.