ArticleBMC genomics2017
CloVR-Comparative: automated, cloud-enabled comparative microbial genome sequence analysis pipeline.
Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution toward extremely high imipenem resistance inAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- Evolution towards extremely high β-lactam resistance inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Adaptation of NontypeablemBio · 2023Article
- Genomic Diversity of Pigeon Pea (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Article
- Characterization of Extremely Drug-Resistant and HypervirulentAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- MDACP: A Pathogen Genome and Metagenome Analysis Cloud Platform.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Article
- CCMP: software-as-a-service approach for fully-automated microbiome profiling.Journal of biomedical informatics: X · 2019Article
- Changes in IgA Protease Expression Are Conferred by Changes in Genomes during Persistent Infection by Nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.Infection and immunity · 2018Article
- Article
- The Streptococcus agalactiae Stringent Response Enhances Virulence and Persistence in Human Blood.Infection and immunity · 2018Article
- Genomic differences between nasal Staphylococcus aureus from hog slaughterhouse workers and their communities.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe benefit of increasing genomic sequence data to the scientific community depends on easy-to-use, scalable bioinformatics support. CloVR-Comparative combines commonly used bioinformatics tools into an intuitive, automated, and cloud-enabled analysis pipeline for comparative microbial genomics.
resultsCloVR-Comparative runs on annotated complete or draft genome sequences that are uploaded by the user or selected via a taxonomic tree-based user interface and downloaded from NCBI. CloVR-Comparative runs reference-free multiple whole-genome alignments to determine unique, shared and core coding sequences (CDSs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Output includes short summary reports and detailed text-based results files, graphical visualizations (phylogenetic trees, circular figures), and a database file linked to the Sybil comparative genome browser. Data up- and download, pipeline configuration and monitoring, and access to Sybil are managed through CloVR-Comparative web interface. CloVR-Comparative and Sybil are distributed as part of the CloVR virtual appliance, which runs on local computers or the Amazon EC2 cloud. Representative datasets (e.g. 40 draft and complete Escherichia coli genomes) are processed in <36 h on a local desktop or at a cost of <$20 on EC2.
conclusionsCloVR-Comparative allows anybody with Internet access to run comparative genomics projects, while eliminating the need for on-site computational resources and expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.