Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28449626›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2017

A Pilot Study Evaluating the Use of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI to Predict Local Recurrence After Radiosurgery on Spinal Metastases.

Kiran A Kumar, Kyung K Peck, Sasan Karimi, Eric Lis, Andrei I Holodny, Mark H Bilsky, Yoshiya Yamada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Spinal metastasis: diagnosis, management and follow-up.The British journal of radiology · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases: a review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kiran A KumarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Kyung K PeckDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Sasan KarimiDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Eric LisDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrei I HolodnyDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mark H BilskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Yoshiya YamadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging offers noninvasive characterization of the vascular microenvironment and hemodynamics. Stereotactic radiosurgery, or stereotactic body radiation therapy, engages a vascular component of the tumor response which may be detectable using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The purpose of this study is to examine whether dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can be used to predict local tumor recurrence in patients with spinal bone metastases who undergo high-dose radiotherapy with stereotactic radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a study of 30 patients with spinal metastases who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging before and after radiotherapy. Twenty patients received single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (24 Gy), while 10 received hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (3-5 fractions, 27-30 Gy total). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the actuarial local recurrence rates. Two perfusion parameters (K

resultsAt 20-month median follow-up, 5 of the 30 patients had pathological evidence of local recurrence. One- and 3-year actuarial local recurrence rates were 24% and 44% for the hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery cohort versus 5% and 16% for the single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery cohort (

conclusionsWe demonstrated that changes in perfusion parameters, particularly V

Indexed as

DCE-MRIhigh-dose RTSBRTspine metastasesSRStumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID28449626
PMCPMC5762041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.