ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2017
Retrospective analysis of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for metastatic lung lesions (MLLs) in comparison with a contemporaneous cohort of primary lung lesions (PLLs).
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe net benefit from local ablative therapy for pulmonary oligometastases remains unknown. The outcomes of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for metastatic lung lesions (MLLs) were analyzed retrospectively and compared with those of SABR for primary lung lesions (PLLs).
methodsMedical records of patients treated with lung SABR between 2011 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Basic patient, lesion and treatment characteristics were compared using the Pearson chi-square test for categorical and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. To estimate the rates of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), survival after the first progression post-SABR (SAPF) and overall survival (OS), the Kaplan-Meier method was used, and the differences between groups were assessed by means of the log rank test. The uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify predictive factors for these endpoints.
resultsTwenty-nine MLLs in 18 consecutive patients and 51 PLLs in 42 patients were treated stereotactically and included in the study. Median follow-up was 14 months (range, 4-40 months). Although patients with MLLs had a significantly better cardiopulmonary function (P=0.0001), more conservative dose-fractionation schedules were prescribed (P=0.0001), but this did not result in a significant difference in LC (P=0.98), PFS (P=0.06) and OS (P=0.14). Multivariate analysis revealed that the dose per fraction (≥ or <12 Gy) was an independent predictor for LC (P=0.02) and PFS (P=0.01) for the whole population, and for PFS (P=0.02) in the PLLs group. Late toxicities ≥ G2 occurred in six patients with PLLs, compared with none in the metastatic group.
conclusionsSABR for MLLs was as successful as for PLLs with respect to LC and OS with lower long-term toxicity in patients with MLLs. Dose per fraction ≥12 Gy turned out to be an independent, favorable prognostic factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.