Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28449475›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2017

A non-randomized retrospective observational study on the subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy: is it feasible in high-risk patients?

Jae Ho Chung, Sung Ho Lee, Eunjue Yi, Jae Seung Jung, Jung Wook Han, Tae Sik Kim, Ho Sung Son, Kwang Taik Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jae Ho ChungDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Sung Ho LeeDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Eunjue YiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Seung JungDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Jung Wook HanDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Sik KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Ho Sung SonDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Kwang Taik KimDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Medical College, Anam Hospital, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Korea University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy is a complex procedure with high morbidity and mortality. Anastomotic leakage is more severe and frequent in patients with preoperative comorbidities and may present with septic conditions. Considering the possibility of an easier management of such cases, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of subcutaneous esophageal reconstruction in patients with high operative risks.

methodsWe performed a non-randomized retrospective observational study on the 75 (subcutaneous: 21, intrathoracic: 54) esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophageal reconstruction either through subcutaneous or intrathoracic route between January 2003 and February 2015. Preoperative data including the estimated reasons for the selection of the subcutaneous route were obtained from medical charts. Clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

resultsThe mean postoperative hospital stay was longer in the subcutaneous group than the overall group. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the subcutaneous group [10 (47.6%)

conclusionsSubcutaneous esophageal reconstruction in high-risk patients showed a higher rate of anastomotic leakage. However, easier correction without fatal septic conditions could be obtained by primary repair or flap reconstruction resulting in lower perioperative mortality. Therefore, esophageal reconstruction through the subcutaneous route is not recommended as a routine primary option. However, in highly selected patients with unfavorable preoperative comorbidities or intraoperative findings, especially those with poor blood supply to the graft, graft hematoma or edema, or gross tumor invasion to surrounding tissues, esophageal reconstruction through the subcutaneous route may carefully be considered as an alternative to the conventional surgical techniques.

Indexed as

Anastomotic leakagecomorbiditiesesophageal reconstructionsubcutaneous route

Identifiers

PMID28449475
PMCPMC5394042
OpenAlexW2598106862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.