Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28449211›Full record

ReviewClinical and experimental immunology2017

Operational tolerance in kidney transplantation and associated biomarkers.

A Massart, L Ghisdal, M Abramowicz, D Abramowicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Tolerogenic Therapies in Cardiac Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Lesson of Immunosuppression in Renal Transplant: Retreat or Hold?The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023
    Observational
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Recent Advances on Biomarkers of Early and Late Kidney Graft Dysfunction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  16. The five dimensions of B cell tolerance.Immunological reviews · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Immune tolerance in transplantation.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A MassartDepartment of Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, CUB Hôpital Erasme and Institute of Interdisciplinary Research in Molecular and Human Biology (IRIBHM), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6196-8555
L GhisdalDepartment of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA, Baudour, Belgium.
M AbramowiczDepartment of Human Genetics, CUB Hôpital Erasme and Institute of Interdisciplinary Research in Molecular and Human Biology (IRIBHM), Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
D AbramowiczDepartment of Nephrology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen and Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 1960s, our predecessors won a historical battle against acute rejection and ensured that transplantation became a common life-saving treatment. In parallel with this success, or perhaps because of it, we lost the battle for long-lived transplants, being overwhelmed with chronic immune insults and the toxicities of immunosuppression. It is likely that current powerful treatments block acute rejection, but at the same time condemn the few circulating donor cells that would have been able to elicit immunoregulatory host responses towards the allograft. Under these conditions, spontaneously tolerant kidney recipients - i.e. patients who maintain allograft function in the absence of immunosuppression - are merely accidents; they are scarce, mysterious and precious. Several teams pursue the goal of finding a biomarker that would guide us towards the 'just right' level of immunosuppression that avoids rejection while leaving some space for donor immune cells. Some cellular assays are attractive because they are antigen-specific, and provide a comprehensive view of immune responses toward the graft. These seem to closely follow patient regulatory capacities. However, these tests are cumbersome, and require abundant cellular material from both donor and recipient. The latest newcomers, non-antigen-specific recipient blood transcriptomic biomarkers, offer the promise that a practicable and simple signature may be found that overcomes the complexity of a system in which an infinite number of individual cell combinations can lead possibly to graft acceptance. Biomarker studies are as much an objective - identifying tolerant patients, enabling tolerance trials - as a means to deciphering the underlying mechanisms of one of the most important current issues in transplantation.

Indexed as

Host vs Graft ReactionKidney TransplantationTransplantation ToleranceBiomarkersHumansImmunosuppression TherapyKidneyTransplantation, HomologousBiomarkersbiomarkercellular assaysimmunoquiescencekidney transplantationoperational tolerance

Identifiers

PMID28449211
PMCPMC5508347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.