Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28449202›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2017

Barn owls maximize head rotations by a combination of yawing and rolling in functionally diverse regions of the neck.

Markus Krings, John A Nyakatura, Mark L L M Boumans, Martin S Fischer, Hermann Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Optocollic responses in adult barn owls (Tyto furcata).Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolutionary versatility of the avian neck.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus KringsDepartment of Animal Physiology and Zoology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
John A NyakaturaAG Morphologie und Formengeschichte, Bild Wissen Gestaltung. Ein interdisziplinäres Labor, Humboldt-University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8088-8684
Mark L L M BoumansDepartment of Animal Physiology and Zoology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Martin S FischerInstitut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Hermann WagnerDepartment of Animal Physiology and Zoology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-7595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owls are known for their outstanding neck mobility: these birds can rotate their heads more than 270°. The anatomical basis of this extraordinary neck rotation ability is not well understood. We used X-ray fluoroscopy of living owls as well as forced neck rotations in dead specimens and computer tomographic (CT) reconstructions to study how the individual cervical joints contribute to head rotation in barn owls (Tyto furcata pratincola). The X-ray data showed the natural posture of the neck, and the reconstructions of the CT-scans provided the shapes of the individual vertebrae. Joint mobility was analyzed in a spherical coordinate system. The rotational capability was described as rotation about the yaw and roll axes. The analyses suggest a functional division of the cervical spine into several regions. Most importantly, an upper region shows high rolling and yawing capabilities. The mobility of the lower, more horizontally oriented joints of the cervical spine is restricted mainly to the roll axis. These rolling movements lead to lateral bending, effectively resulting in a side shift of the head compared with the trunk during large rotations. The joints in the middle of the cervical spine proved to contribute less to head rotation. The analysis of joint mobility demonstrated how owls might maximize horizontal head rotation by a specific and variable combination of yawing and rolling in functionally diverse regions of the neck.

Indexed as

AnimalsCervical VertebraeNeck MusclesStrigiformescervical jointscervical vertebraehead mobilityspineTyto

Identifiers

PMID28449202
PMCPMC5472525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.