ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
SigSeeker: a peak-calling ensemble approach for constructing epigenetic signatures.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment of regulatory elements during erythro-megakaryopoiesis identifies hematopoietic lineage-commitment points.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationEpigenetic data are invaluable when determining the regulatory programs governing a cell. Based on use of next-generation sequencing data for characterizing epigenetic marks and transcription factor binding, numerous peak-calling approaches have been developed to determine sites of genomic significance in these data. Such analyses can produce a large number of false positive predictions, suggesting that sites supported by multiple algorithms provide a stronger foundation for inferring and characterizing regulatory programs associated with the epigenetic data. Few methodologies integrate epigenetic based predictions of multiple approaches when combining profiles generated by different tools.
resultsThe SigSeeker peak-calling ensemble uses multiple tools to identify peaks, and with user-defined thresholds for peak overlap and signal strength it retains only those peaks that are concordant across multiple tools. Peaks predicted to be co-localized by only a very small number of tools, discovered to be only marginally overlapping, or found to represent significant outliers to the approximation model are removed from the results, providing concise and high quality epigenetic datasets. SigSeeker has been validated using established benchmarks for transcription factor binding and histone modification ChIP-Seq data. These comparisons indicate that the quality of our ensemble technique exceeds that of single tool approaches, enhances existing peak-calling ensembles, and results in epigenetic profiles of higher confidence. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://sigseeker.org. CONTACT: lichtenbergj@mail.nih.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.