Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28448663›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2017

PRAME as a Potential Target for Immunotherapy in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

Gülçin Gezgin, Sietse J Luk, Jinfeng Cao, Mehmet Dogrusöz, Dirk M van der Steen, Renate S Hagedoorn, Daniëlle Krijgsman, Pieter A van der Velden, Matthew G Field, Gregorius P M Luyten and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. PRAME Expression in Melanoma is Negatively Regulated by TET2-Mediated DNA Hydroxymethylation.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gülçin GezginDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sietse J LukDepartment of Haematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jinfeng CaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands3Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Mehmet DogrusözDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dirk M van der SteenDepartment of Haematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Renate S HagedoornDepartment of Haematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Daniëlle KrijgsmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Pieter A van der VeldenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Matthew G FieldBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Gregorius P M LuytenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Karoly SzuhaiDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J William HarbourBascom Palmer Eye Institute, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Ekaterina S JordanovaDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands7Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mirjam H M HeemskerkDepartment of Haematology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Martine J JagerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Marco Ruggeri · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
THE GENETICS OF OCULAR MELANOMAR01CA161870 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BOWCOCK, ANNE MARY · 2011 to 2024
$5.5M
MOLECULAR PREDICTIVE TESTING IN OCULAR MELANOMAR01CA125970 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CORREA, ZELIA MARIA, HARBOUR, JAMES WILLIAM · 2006 to 2021
$4.9M
The role of PRAME in promoting metastasis in uveal melanomaF30CA206430 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FIELD, MATTHEW GARRETT · 2016 to 2018
$147k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA206430NCI NIH HHS R01 CA125970NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161870NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Uveal melanoma (UM) is an intraocular primary malignant neoplasm that often gives rise to metastatic disease for which there are no effective therapies. A substantial proportion of UMs express the cancer-testis antigen PRAME (preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma), which can potentially be targeted by adoptive T-cell therapy. Objective: To determine whether there may be a rationale for PRAME-directed T-cell therapy for metastatic UM. Design, Setting, and Participants: An experimental study using a retrospective cohort of 64 patients with UM (median follow-up, 62 months) was conducted from January 8, 2015, to November 20, 2016, at the Leiden University Medical Center. Clinical, histopathologic, and genetic parameters were compared between 64 PRAME-positive and PRAME-negative UMs. HLA class I restricted, PRAME-specific T cells were stimulated with UM cell lines to measure their antigen-specific reactivity against these cell lines, which were analyzed for PRAME expression by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Uveal melanoma metastases from 16 unrelated patients were assessed for PRAME expression by messenger RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and for HLA class I expression by immunofluorescence staining. Main Outcomes and Measures: Interferon γ production for antigen-specific reactivity and detection of PRAME and HLA class I expression in primary and metastatic UM. Results: Of the 64 patients in the study (31 women and 33 men; mean [SD] age at the time of enucleation, 60.6 [15.6] years), PRAME expression was negative in 35 primary UMs and positive in 29 primary UMs. Positive PRAME expression was associated with a high largest basal diameter (15.0 vs 12.0 mm; P = .005), ciliary body involvement (59% vs 26%; P = .008), and amplification of chromosome 8q (66% vs 23%; P = .002). PRAME-specific T cells reacted against 4 of 7 UM cell lines, demonstrating that T-cell reactivity correlated with PRAME expression. Metastatic UM samples were positive for PRAME messenger RNA in 11 of 16 patients and for HLA class I in 10 of 16 patients, with 8 of 16 patients demonstrating coexpression of both PRAME and HLA class I. Conclusions and Relevance: PRAME is expressed in many primary and metastatic UMs, and about half of the metastatic UMs coexpress PRAME and HLA class I. The finding that PRAME-specific T cells in this study reacted against PRAME-positive UM cell lines suggests a potential role for PRAME-directed immunotherapy for selected patients with metastatic UM.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorDNA, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunotherapyIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorDNA, NeoplasmPRAME protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28448663
PMCPMC5509351
OpenAlexW2608198193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.