Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28448501›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Employment 12 months after kidney transplantation: An in-depth bio-psycho-social analysis of the Swiss Transplant Cohort.

Brigitta Danuser, Amira Simcox, Regina Studer, Michael Koller, Pascal Wild, Psychosocial Interest Group, Swiss Transplant Cohort Study

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mapping health-related quality of life after kidney transplantation by group comparisons: a systematic review.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Work status and work ability of patients receiving kidney replacement therapy: results from a European survey.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. The Preventable Productivity Burden of Kidney Disease in Australia.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brigitta DanuserInstitut Universitaire Romand de Santé au Travail (Institute for Work and Health), University of Lausanne and University of Geneva, Epalinges - Lausanne, Switzerland.
Amira SimcoxInstitut Universitaire Romand de Santé au Travail (Institute for Work and Health), University of Lausanne and University of Geneva, Epalinges - Lausanne, Switzerland.
Regina StuderInstitut Universitaire Romand de Santé au Travail (Institute for Work and Health), University of Lausanne and University of Geneva, Epalinges - Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-5378
Michael KollerBasel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Pascal WildInstitut Universitaire Romand de Santé au Travail (Institute for Work and Health), University of Lausanne and University of Geneva, Epalinges - Lausanne, Switzerland.
Psychosocial Interest Group, Swiss Transplant Cohort Study
University of Geneva · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReturn to work with or after a chronic disease is a dynamic process influenced by a variety of interactions between personal, work, societal and medical resources or constraints. The aim of this study was to identify predictors for employment 12 months after transplantation in kidney patients, applying a bio-psycho-social model.

methodsAll kidney patients followed in the Swiss Transplant Cohort between May 2008 and December 2012, aged 18 to 65 were assessed before, 6 and 12 months after transplantation.

resultsOf the 689 included patients, 56.2% worked 12 months post- transplantation compared to 58.9% pre-transplantation. Age, education, self-perceived health (6 months post- transplantation), pre- transplantation employment and receiving an organ from a living donor are significant predictors of employment post- transplantation. Moreover, while self-perceived health increased post- transplantation, depression score decreased only among those employed 12 months post- transplantation. Pre- transplantation employment status was the main predictor for post- transplantation employment (OR = 18.6) and was associated with sex, age, education, depression and duration of dialysis. An organ from a living donor (42.1%) was more frequent in younger patients, with higher education, no diabetes and shorter waiting time to surgery.

conclusionTransplantation did not increase employment in end-stage kidney disease patients but helped maintaining employment. Pre-transplantation employment has been confirmed to be the most important predictor of post-transplantation employment. Furthermore, socio-demographic and individual factors predicted directly and indirectly the post-transplantation employment status. With living donor, an additional predictor linked to social factors and the medical procedure has been identified.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesEmploymentFemaleHumansKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedSocial ClassSwitzerlandYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28448501
PMCPMC5407833
OpenAlexW2608732680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.