Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28448200›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2017

Better Together: The Making and Maturation of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group.

Christine L Ritchie, Kathryn I Pollak, Karen A Kehl, Jeri L Miller, Jean S Kutner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The National Institute of Nursing Research: A Glance Back, andA Vision for the Future.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine L Ritchie1 Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco, California.
Kathryn I Pollak2 Department of Family Medicine, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina.
Karen A Kehl3 Office of End-of-Life and Palliative Care Research, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Jeri L Miller3 Office of End-of-Life and Palliative Care Research, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health , Bethesda, Maryland.
Jean S Kutner4 Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, Colorado.

Funding

Refinement and Expansion of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC)U24NR014637 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTNER, JEAN S, POLLAK, KATHRYN I · 2013 to 2017
$9.6M
Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC): Refinement and ExpansionU2CNR014637 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI COLBORN, KATHRYN LOUISE · 2018 to 2022
$8.6M
NINR NIH HHS U24 NR014637NINR NIH HHS U2C NR014637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the growth and outcomes of the Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group (PCRC).

backgroundDespite advances, significant gaps remain in the evidence base to inform care for people with serious illness. To generate this needed evidence and bolster research capacity, the Palliative Care Research Cooperative (PCRC) group was formed.

methodsThe PCRC supports investigators in the conduct of multisite clinical studies. After developing a governance structure and completing a proof of concept demonstration study, the PCRC expanded its infrastructure to include additional resource cores (Clinical Studies; Measurement; Data Informatics and Statistics; and Caregiver Studies). The PCRC also supports an Investigator Development Center as many palliative care investigators valued opportunities to advance their skills. Additional key aspects of PCRC resources include a Scientific Review Committee, a Publications Committee, and initiatives to purposefully engage investigators in a community of palliative care science.

resultsThe PCRC has grown to over 300 members representing more than 130 distinct sites. To date, the PCRC has supported the submission of 51 research applications and has engaged in 27 studies. The PCRC supports investigator research development needs through webinars and clinical trials "intensives." To foster a sense of community, the PCRC has convened biannual meetings, developed special interest groups, and regularly communicates via a newsletter and its website.

conclusionWith a particular focus on facilitating conduct of rigorous multisite clinical studies, the PCRC fosters an engaged multidisciplinary research community, filling an important void in generating and disseminating evidence that informs the provision of high-quality care to people with serious illness.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPalliative CareResearchResearch Personnelinvestigator developmentmulti-site studiespalliative carepalliative care researchresearch

Identifiers

PMID28448200
PMCPMC5455608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.