ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017
Association between small-for-gestational age and neurocognitive impairment at two years of corrected age among infants born at preterm gestational ages: a cohort study.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Graphical Network Analysis of Small-for-Gestational-Age in Preterm Infants: Integrating Neonatal Brain Volume, Structural Connectivity, and Early Neurodevelopmental Outcome.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Developmental trajectories of late preterm infants and predictors of academic performance.Pediatric research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the association between small-for-gestational age (SGA) and neurocognitive impairment at 2 years of corrected age among infants born at preterm gestational ages. STUDY
designA secondary analysis of a prospectively conducted NICHD/Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units BEAM trial. Non-anomalous pregnancies delivered before 37 weeks of gestation were included in the analysis. Neurocognitive outcomes at 2 years of corrected age were compared between infants who were SGA (<10% for gestational age) and those appropriately grown (AGA). The primary outcome was a severe or moderate neurocognitive impairment at 2 years of corrected age among survivors, defined as either mental (MDI) or psychomotor (PDI) developmental index score <70 for severe and <85 for moderate impairment.
resultsOf 2299 preterm neonates 67 (3%) were SGA. SGA infants were more often twin pregnancies (31% vs 17%, P=0.003) and delivered more often by cesarean section (63% vs 40%, P<0.001) at similar gestational ages (30.0±2.6 vs 29.5±2.8 weeks, P=0.11). At 2 years of corrected age, SGA and AGA survivors had similar rates of neurocognitive impairment (MDI <70: 18% vs 18%, P=1.0; MDI <85: 44% vs 46%, P=0.96; PDI <70: 20% vs 15%, P=0.51; PDI <85: 40% vs 34%, P=0.48).
conclusionIn this cohort, SGA at preterm gestational ages was associated with similar rates of neurocognitive impairment at two years of corrected age among surviving infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.