Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28447612›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Distinct molecular cues ensure a robust microtubule-dependent nuclear positioning in the Drosophila oocyte.

Nicolas Tissot, Jean-Antoine Lepesant, Fred Bernard, Kevin Legent, Floris Bosveld, Charlotte Martin, Orestis Faklaris, Yohanns Bellaïche, Maïté Coppey, Antoine Guichet

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Polarity Events in theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. GFP-Tagged Protein Detection by Electron Microscopy Using a GBP-APEX Tool inFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Cytoskeletal control of nuclear migration in neurons and non-neuronal cells.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicolas TissotPolarity and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS UMR 7592, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne sParis Cité, Paris Cedex 75205, France.
Jean-Antoine LepesantPolarity and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS UMR 7592, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne sParis Cité, Paris Cedex 75205, France.
Fred BernardPolarity and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS UMR 7592, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne sParis Cité, Paris Cedex 75205, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7919-253X
Kevin LegentPolarity and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS UMR 7592, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne sParis Cité, Paris Cedex 75205, France.
Floris BosveldPolarity, Division and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR 3215, INSERM U934, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 05 75248, France.
Charlotte MartinPolarity, Division and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR 3215, INSERM U934, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 05 75248, France.
Orestis FaklarisPolarity and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS UMR 7592, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne sParis Cité, Paris Cedex 75205, France.
Yohanns BellaïchePolarity, Division and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR 3215, INSERM U934, 26 rue d'Ulm, Paris Cedex 05 75248, France.
Maïté CoppeyPolarity and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS UMR 7592, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne sParis Cité, Paris Cedex 75205, France.
Antoine GuichetPolarity and Morphogenesis Team, Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS UMR 7592, Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne sParis Cité, Paris Cedex 75205, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling nucleus localization is crucial for a variety of cellular functions. In the Drosophila oocyte, nuclear asymmetric positioning is essential for the reorganization of the microtubule (MT) network that controls the polarized transport of axis determinants. A combination of quantitative three-dimensional live imaging and laser ablation-mediated force analysis reveal that nuclear positioning is ensured with an unexpected level of robustness. We show that the nucleus is pushed to the oocyte antero-dorsal cortex by MTs and that its migration can proceed through distinct tracks. Centrosome-associated MTs favour one migratory route. In addition, the MT-associated protein Mud/NuMA that is asymmetrically localized in an Asp-dependent manner at the nuclear envelope hemisphere where MT nucleation is higher promotes a separate route. Our results demonstrate that centrosomes do not provide an obligatory driving force for nuclear movement, but together with Mud, contribute to the mechanisms that ensure the robustness of asymmetric nuclear positioning.

Indexed as

Active Transport, Cell NucleusAnimalsCell NucleusCentrosomeDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesNerve Tissue ProteinsNuclear EnvelopeOocytesDrosophila ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMud protein, DrosophilaNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28447612
PMCPMC5414183
OpenAlexW2607960270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.