Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28447466›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2018

Results of a Randomized Trial on an Intervention Promoting Adoption of Occupational Sun Protection Policies.

David B Buller, Barbara J Walkosz, Mary Klein Buller, Allan Wallis, Peter A Andersen, Michael D Scott, Rachel Eye, Xia Liu, Gary Cutter

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

David B Buller1 Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
Barbara J Walkosz1 Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
Mary Klein Buller1 Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
Allan Wallis2 School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA.
Peter A Andersen3 School of Communication, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.
Michael D Scott4 Department of Communication Arts and Sciences, California State University, Chico, CA, USA.
Rachel Eye1 Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
Xia Liu1 Klein Buendel, Inc, Golden, CO, USA.
Gary Cutter5 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Klein Buendel (United States) · USCalifornia State University, Chico · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Sun Safe Workplaces: A Campaign on Sun Protection Policies for Outdoor WorkersR01CA134705 · NCI · KLEIN BUENDEL, INC. · PI BULLER, DAVID B, WALKOSZ, BARBARA · 2009 to 2014
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134705
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate an intervention promoting adoption of occupational sun protection policies by employers in a randomized trial.

designA randomized pretest-posttest controlled design with 2-year follow-up was conducted in 2010 to 2013.

settingLocal government organizations in Colorado who had outdoor workers in public works, public safety, and/or parks and recreation.

participantsNinety-eight local government organizations (n = 51 municipalities, 10 counties, and 37 special districts).

interventionOrganizations were randomly assigned to receive a policy and education intervention comprised of personal contacts and theory-based training and materials or to an attention control group. MEASURES: Occupational policy documents were coded for sun safety content by a trained research assistant blind to condition. ANALYSIS: Policy scores were analyzed with logistic and Poisson regression models using imputation.

resultsAt posttest, more organizations in the intervention group had a sun protection policy than in the control group (odds ratio [OR] = 4.91, P < .05; intent to treat: OR = 5.95, P < .05) and policies were more extensive (χ

conclusionThe intervention had a large effect on adoption of formal sun protection policies, perhaps because of its fit with legal requirements to maintain safe workplaces. Personal contacts with managers were influential on adoption of occupational policy even in this age of communication technology and social media.

Indexed as

Health PolicyOccupational HealthColoradoFemaleHealth PromotionHumansLocal GovernmentMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational PolicySkin NeoplasmsSunburnoccupationpolicyskin cancersun protection

Identifiers

PMID28447466
PMCPMC5570658
OpenAlexW2608227397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.