ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2017
Investigation of contact characteristics and frictional properties of natural articular cartilage at two different surface configurations.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural cartilage surfaces were macroscopically curved with multi-porous viscoelastic biologic materials with extremely high water, but whether curved surface configuration could play an important role on the contact and frictional properties of natural cartilages fails to be completely understood up to now. In this current study, cartilage samples came from the 18-24 month-old bovine femora. Contact characteristic and frictional properties at two cartilage configurations were investigated using the UMT-2 testing rig and the five-point sliding average method would be adopted to analyze these tested data. These results indicated the surface displacement was extremely associated with the plate cartilage surface and seemed to be a representative of cartilage surface configuration. The summit of the surface load lagged behind that of the surface displacement at the same condition. Coefficient of friction showed obviously different variation with time at two cartilage surface configurations due to the fact that these two surface displacements had different amplitudes and opposite directions as a function of the sliding length. Therefore, surface configuration played the main role on these variables of contact displacement, contact load and coefficient of friction due to the direction and magnitude of the surface displacement while applied load and sliding velocity had a secondary role. Natural cartilage surfaces were macroscopically curved with multi-porous viscoelastic biologic materials with extremely high water, but whether curved surface configuration could play an important role on the contact and frictional properties of natural cartilages fails to be completely understood up to now. In this study, two different cartilage configurations were adopted to investigate natural cartilage properties, and the five-point sliding average method would be used to analyze these tested data. These results indicated the contact displacement was consisted of cartilage deformation and surface displacement while contact load was composed of steady load and surface load (as shown in the figure, panels (a) and (b)). Surface displacement was greatly associated with the plate cartilage surface and seemed to be a representative of cartilage surface configuration. These two surface displacements had different amplitudes and opposite directions as a function of the sliding length (as shown in panel (c)). The summit of the surface load lagged behind that of the surface displacement at the same condition (as shown in panel (d)). Surface displacement and surface load in the contact characteristic of natural cartilages were extremely related with the cartilage configurations. and their correlation coefficients varied periodically with the moving time (as shown in panel (e)). Coefficient of friction showed obviously different variation with time (as shown in panel (f)). Therefore, surface configuration played the main role on these variables of contact displacement, contact load and coefficient of friction due to the direction and magnitude of the surface displacement while applied load and sliding velocity had a secondary role. Variation in contact and frictional properties of natural cartilage at two different surface configurations (a) Contact displacement and its parts varied with time; (b) Contact load and its parts varied with time;
Indexed as
Identifiers
28447291What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.