Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28446804›Full record

Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2017

The effects of increasing calcium channel blocker dose vs. adding a diuretic to treatment regimens for patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Shigemasa Tani, Kei Asayama, Koji Oiwa, Shinsuke Harasawa, Katsuaki Okubo, Atsuhiko Takahashi, Ayumi Tanabe, Takayoshi Ohkubo, Atsushi Hirayama, Toshio Kushiro

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antihypertensive treatment effect of two dual therapies according to sodium sensitivity.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Treatment patterns and adherence to antihypertensive combination therapies in Japan using a claims database.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2019
    Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shigemasa TaniDepartment of Cardiovascular Center, Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei AsayamaDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koji OiwaJapan Community Health Care Organization, Yokohama Chuo Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Shinsuke HarasawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Center, Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsuaki OkuboDepartment of Cardiovascular Center, Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsuhiko TakahashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Center, Nihon University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayumi TanabeDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayoshi OhkuboDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi HirayamaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshio KushiroLife Planning Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Nihon University · JPGunma Chuo Hospital · JPKeio University · JPTeikyo University · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with insufficient blood pressure (BP) control, despite using a combination regimen containing an angiotensin receptor blocker and a calcium channel blocker (CCB), whether a greater dose of CCB or adding a diuretic is more effective at lowering BP remains unclear. We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of switching from the daily administration of a single-pill fixed-dose combination of irbesartan (100 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) to irbesartan (100 mg) with an increased dose of amlodipine (10 mg) (HD group, n=62) or irbesartan (100 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) with 1 mg of indapamide (D group, n=63) in patients with poorly controlled hypertension. BP measured at home was monitored by a physician using a telemonitoring system. Between the HD and D groups, no significant differences were observed in morning home BP changes (mean reduction of systolic/diastolic BP, 1.7/0.9 mmHg; 95% confidence intervals, -2.4 to 5.7/-1.4 to 3.2; P=0.19/0.37), achievement rate of target BP (45.2% vs. 42.9%, P=0.80), BP variability independent of the mean (P⩾0.74), other variability indices (P⩾0.55) and time to stabilization, which was calculated using a fitted analysis (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.99). Although a significant increase in serum uric acid was observed in the D group (P<0.0001), neither clinically relevant abnormal laboratory test results nor critical BP changes were observed throughout the trial period. Both antihypertensive drug combination strategies were effective treatment options. Further investigation is required to determine the appropriate use of both therapies based on the various pathologies associated with hypertension.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsBlood PressureCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHypertensionIrbesartanMaleMiddle AgedAmlodipineAntihypertensive AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsIrbesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID28446804
OpenAlexW2608370482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.