Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28446260›Full record

SynthesisEpidemiology and infection2017

Human papillomavirus 9-valent vaccine for cancer prevention: a systematic review of the available evidence.

C Signorelli, A Odone, V Ciorba, P Cella, R A Audisio, A Lombardi, L Mariani, F S Mennini, S Pecorelli, G Rezza and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Epidemiology and infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cervical Cancer Immunotherapy: Facts and Hopes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

C SignorelliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
A OdoneDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5657-9774
V CiorbaEuropean Institute of Oncology - Medical Office, Milan, Italy.
P CellaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
R A AudisioUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
A LombardiGiovanni Lorenzini Medical Science Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
L MarianiHPV-Unit, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
F S MenniniCentre for Economic and International Studies, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
S PecorelliSchool of Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
G RezzaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
G V ZuccottiDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
A PeracinoGiovanni Lorenzini Medical Science Foundation, Houston, TX, USA.
University of Parma · ITBuddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation · USEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITIstituto Superiore di Sanità · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2014, the Food and Drug Administration approved a new human papillomavirus 9-valent vaccine (9vHPV), targeting nine HPV types: HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18, which are also targeted by the quadrivalent HPV vaccine (qHPV), plus five additional high cancer risk HPV types (HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58). The aim of the current study was to systematically retrieve, qualitatively and quantitatively pool, as well as critically appraise all available evidence on 9vHPV from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a systematic review of the literature on 9vHPV efficacy, immunogenicity and safety, as well as a systematic search of registered, completed, and ongoing RCTs. We retrieved and screened 227 records for eligibility. A total of 10 publications reported on RCTs' results on 9vHPV and were included in the review. Sixteen RCTs on 9vHPV have been registered on RCT registries. There is evidence that 9vHPV generated a response to HPV types 6, 11, 16 and 18 that was non-inferior to qHPV. Vaccine efficacy against five additional HPV type-related diseases was directly assessed on females aged 16-26 years (risk reduction against high-grade cervical, vulvar or vaginal disease = 96·7%, 95% CI 80·9%-99·8%). Bridging efficacy was demonstrated for males and females aged 9-15 years and males aged 16-26 years (the lower bound of the 95% CIs of both the geometric mean titer ratio and difference in seroconversion rates meeting the criteria for non-inferiority for all HPV types). Overall, 9vHPV has been proved to be safe and well tolerated. Other RCTs addressed: 9vHPV co-administration with other vaccines, 9vHPV administration in subjects that previously received qHPV and 9vHPV efficacy in regimens containing fewer than three doses. The inclusion of additional HPV types in 9vHPV offers great potential to expand protection against HPV infection. However, the impact of 9vHPV on reducing the global burden of HPV-related disease will greatly depend on vaccine uptake, coverage, availability, and affordability.

Indexed as

HumansNeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesCancer preventionHPVhuman papillomavirus 9-valent vaccinesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28446260
PMCPMC5974698
OpenAlexW2608169224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.