Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28446234›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2017

Retinal vessel diameters and reactivity in diabetes mellitus and/or cardiovascular disease.

R Heitmar, G Y H Lip, R E Ryder, A D Blann

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Quantifying Lateral Pulsation in Retinal Vessels Within the Optic Disc.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. The Eyes.Circulation research · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R HeitmarSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK. r.heitmar1@aston.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7657-1788
G Y H LipSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
R E RyderDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, City Hospital, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
A D BlannInstitute for Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, City Hospital, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
Aston University · GBBirmingham City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetinal vessel calibre and vascular dilation/constriction in response to flicker light provocation may provide a measure distinguishing patients suffering from diabetes mellitus and/or cardiovascular disease.

methodsOne hundred and sixteen age and sex matched patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), cardiovascular disease (CVD) and both DM and CVD (DM + CVD) underwent systemic and intraocular pressure measurements. Retinal vessel calibres were assessed using a validated computer-based program to compute central retinal artery and vein equivalents (CRVE) from monochromatic retinal images. Vessel dilation and constriction responses to flicker light provocation were assessed by continuous retinal vessel diameter recordings. Plasma endothelial markers von Willebrand factor (vWf) and soluble E selectin (sEsel) were measured by ELISA.

resultsRetinal vessel calibres were comparable across groups but CRVE correlated significantly with disease duration in DM patients (r = 0.57, p < 0.001). Patients suffering DM only exhibited reduced arterial vasomotion at rest and reduced arterial constriction following flicker light induced vessel dilation compared to patients with CVD and those suffering both CVD + DM (p = 0.030). Patients suffering from CVD + DM exhibited significant differences between each flicker cycle in regards to arterial maximum constriction (p = 0.006) and time needed to reach arterial maximum dilation (p = 0.004), whereas the other two groups did not show such inconsistencies between individual flicker cycles. vWf was raised in CVD + DM compared to the other two groups (p ≤ 0.02), whilst sEsel was raised in CVD + DM compared to DM alone (p = 0.044).

conclusionsDynamic retinal vascular calibres as obtained by continuous diameter measurements using flicker light provocation can reveal subtle differences between groups suffering from CVD with and without DM. This difference in reaction pattern and lack of arterial constriction in DM may provide a suitable marker to monitor progression.

Indexed as

VasoconstrictionVasodilationAgedBiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic RetinopathyDisease ProgressionEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayE-SelectinFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureLightMaleBiomarkersE-SelectinSELE protein, humanvon Willebrand FactorBlood glucoseCardiovascular diseaseDiabetes mellitusRetinal vessel diameterRetinal vessel reactivity

Identifiers

PMID28446234
PMCPMC5406879
OpenAlexW2608553529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.