Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28446177›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2017

The susceptibility to fosfomycin of Gram-negative bacteria isolates from urinary tract infection in the Czech Republic: data from a unicentric study.

Miroslav Fajfr, Miroslav Louda, Pavla Paterová, Lenka Ryšková, Jaroslav Pacovský, Josef Košina, Helena Žemličková, Miloš Broďák

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Providencial Progression: Time to be Intolerant.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miroslav FajfrInstitute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralové, Sokolska 581, Hradec Králové, 50005, Czech Republic. miroslav.fajfr@fnhk.cz.
Miroslav LoudaCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralové, Simkova 870, Hradec Kralove, 500 38, Czech Republic.
Pavla PaterováInstitute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralové, Sokolska 581, Hradec Králové, 50005, Czech Republic.
Lenka RyškováInstitute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralové, Sokolska 581, Hradec Králové, 50005, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav PacovskýCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralové, Simkova 870, Hradec Kralove, 500 38, Czech Republic.
Josef KošinaCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralové, Simkova 870, Hradec Kralove, 500 38, Czech Republic.
Helena ŽemličkováInstitute of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Hradec Kralové, Sokolska 581, Hradec Králové, 50005, Czech Republic.
Miloš BroďákCharles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralové, Simkova 870, Hradec Kralove, 500 38, Czech Republic.
University Hospital Hradec Králové · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAgainst a background of rapid increase of β-lactamase-producing or multi-resistant pathogenic bacteria and the resulting lack of effective antibiotic treatment, some older antibiotics have been tested for new therapeutic uses. One of these is fosfomycin, to which according to studies these resistant bacteria are very sensitive. Our study was designed because there is no data on the fosfomycin susceptibility rate in the Czech Republic.

methodIn this study from January 2013 to June 2014 3295 unique isolates of Gram-negative bacteria which had caused urinary tract infections were examined. The antibiotic susceptibility was measured by disk diffusion test. Both EUCAST and CLSI guidelines criteria (for fosfomycin only) were used for the antibiotic susceptibility evaluation.

resultsThe most frequently tested bacterial isolates were Escherichia coli (51.3%, n = 1703), Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.4%, n = 643) and Proteus spp. (11.8%, n = 392). Among all isolates 29.0% (n = 963) were resistant to fluoroquinolones, 11.3% (n = 374) produced extended spectrum β-lactamase and 4.2% (n = 141) produced AmpC β-lactamase. The overall in vitro susceptibility was significantly higher for fosfomycin compared to the other tested per-oral antibiotics (nitrofurantoin, ampicillin, co-trimoxazole, ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime) against all tested Gram-negative rod isolates (excluding Morganella morgani and Acinetobacter spp. isolates). Fosfomycin also remained highly active against those isolates with extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production (95.8% in Escherichia coli isolates and 85.3% in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates), unlike other tested per-oral antibiotics, which showed significant (p < 0.0001) susceptibility decrease.

conclusionWe have confirmed in the Czech Republic the very high susceptibility to fosfomycin trometamol of urinary tract infection pathogens, particularly Gram-negative rods including those producing β-lactamase.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCzech RepublicFosfomycinGram-Negative BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsUrinary Tract InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesFosfomycinFosfomycinSusceptibilityUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID28446177
PMCPMC5406914
OpenAlexW2608381155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.