Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28446009›Full record

ReviewInternational neurourology journal2017

Applications of Microfluidic Devices for Urology.

Se Jik Han, Hun-Kuk Park, Kyung Sook Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International neurourology journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. New Equipment and Devices for Therapeutic Purpose.International neurourology journal · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Se Jik HanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Hun-Kuk ParkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Kyung Sook KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3572-1169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidics is considered an important technology that is suitable for numerous biomedical applications, including cancer diagnosis, metastasis, drug delivery, and tissue engineering. Although microfluidics is still considered to be a new approach in urological research, several pioneering studies have been reported in recent years. In this paper, we reviewed urological research works using microfluidic devices. Microfluidic devices were used for the detection of prostate and bladder cancer and the characterization of cancer microenvironments. The potential applications of microfluidics in urinary analysis and sperm sorting were demonstrated. The use of microfluidic devices in urology research can provide high-throughput, high-precision, and low-cost analyzing platforms.

Indexed as

MicrofluidicsProstatic NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrineUrology

Identifiers

PMID28446009
PMCPMC5426427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.