Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28445515›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Correlation of histopathologic characteristics to protein expression and function in malignant melanoma.

Charlotte Welinder, Krzysztof Pawłowski, A Marcell Szasz, Maria Yakovleva, Yutaka Sugihara, Johan Malm, Göran Jönsson, Christian Ingvar, Lotta Lundgren, Bo Baldetorp and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. IL-6-Driven Autocrine Lactate Promotes Immune Escape of Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Charlotte WelinderDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9626-0576
Krzysztof PawłowskiFaculty of Agriculture and Biology, Dept. of Experimental Design and Bioinformatics, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warszawa, Poland.
A Marcell SzaszDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Maria YakovlevaCentre of Excellence in Biological and Medical Mass Spectrometry "CEBMMS", Biomedical Centre D13, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Yutaka SugiharaDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Johan MalmCentre of Excellence in Biological and Medical Mass Spectrometry "CEBMMS", Biomedical Centre D13, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Göran JönssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Christian IngvarDept. of Surgery, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lotta LundgrenDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Bo BaldetorpDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Håkan OlssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Melinda RezeliClinical Protein Science & Imaging, Biomedical Centre, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Lund University, BMC D13, Lund, Sweden.
Thomas LaurellCentre of Excellence in Biological and Medical Mass Spectrometry "CEBMMS", Biomedical Centre D13, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Elisabet WieslanderDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Dept. of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
György Marko-VargaCentre of Excellence in Biological and Medical Mass Spectrometry "CEBMMS", Biomedical Centre D13, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESemmelweis University · HUTokyo Medical University · JPWarsaw University of Life Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic melanoma is still one of the most prevalent skin cancers, which upon progression has neither a prognostic marker nor a specific and lasting treatment. Proteomic analysis is a versatile approach with high throughput data and results that can be used for characterizing tissue samples. However, such analysis is hampered by the complexity of the disease, heterogeneity of patients, tumors, and samples themselves. With the long term aim of quest for better diagnostics biomarkers, as well as predictive and prognostic markers, we focused on relating high resolution proteomics data to careful histopathological evaluation of the tumor samples and patient survival information. PATIENTS AND

methodsRegional lymph node metastases obtained from ten patients with metastatic melanoma (stage III) were analyzed by histopathology and proteomics using mass spectrometry. Out of the ten patients, six had clinical follow-up data. The protein deep mining mass spectrometry data was related to the histopathology tumor tissue sections adjacent to the area used for deep-mining. Clinical follow-up data provided information on disease progression which could be linked to protein expression aiming to identify tissue-based specific protein markers for metastatic melanoma and prognostic factors for prediction of progression of stage III disease.

resultsIn this feasibility study, several proteins were identified that positively correlated to tumor tissue content including IF6, ARF4, MUC18, UBC12, CSPG4, PCNA, PMEL and MAGD2. The study also identified MYC, HNF4A and TGFB1 as top upstream regulators correlating to tumor tissue content. Other proteins were inversely correlated to tumor tissue content, the most significant being; TENX, EHD2, ZA2G, AOC3, FETUA and THRB. A number of proteins were significantly related to clinical outcome, among these, HEXB, PKM and GPNMB stood out, as hallmarks of processes involved in progression from stage III to stage IV disease and poor survival.

conclusionIn this feasibility study, promising results show the feasibility of relating proteomics to histopathology and clinical outcome, and insight thus can be gained into the molecular processes driving the disease. The combined analysis of histological features including the sample cellular composition with protein expression of each metastasis enabled the identification of novel, differentially expressed proteins. Further studies are necessary to determine whether these putative biomarkers can be utilized in diagnostics and prognostic prediction of metastatic melanoma.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionFemaleHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4HumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProteomicsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycBiomarkers, TumorHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4HNF4A protein, humanMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTransforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID28445515
PMCPMC5405986
OpenAlexW2607789980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.