ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2017
Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III Study of Pre-operative Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Using the Nimbus Ambulatory Infusion System in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Free Flap-based Breast Reconstruction
NOVEMBER (Novem- (9), BrEast Radiation), A Phase II Trial of a 9 Day Course of Whole Breast Radiotherapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer
Emotional Evaluation and Reconstructed Breast Satisfaction After Breast Cancer Treatment: Breast Q Questionary
Patient Reported Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery
Who cites it
93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive versus conventional nipple-sparing mastectomy with prosthesis breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Quality of life after breast (reconstructive) surgery-an interim analysis of a prospective three-arm clinical trial with a 10-year follow-up (REKO 001).Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Trial
- Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.JAMA surgery · 2018Trial
- The growing high-risk population.American journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Bilateral Stacked Flap and Hybrid Breast Reconstruction: Clinical Results and Patient-reported Outcomes.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Comparison of Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life After Mastectomy and Breast Conserving Therapy.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Age-stratified difference in patient-reported health-related quality of life following breast cancer surgery.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- The Impact of Time and Place on BREAST-Q REACT: A Multi-Institutional Examination.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- DIEP flap breast reconstruction at a low-volume center: bringing high-quality autologous breast reconstruction to the community.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Garment-related patient-reported outcomes: a longitudinal pre-post comparison of autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2026Article
- Navigating the Challenges of Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEAP) Flap Harvest in a Scarred Abdomen.Cureus · 2026Article
- Impact of Contralateral Implant Placement in Unilateral Implant-Based Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the impacts of previous breast surgery on surgical complications and aesthetic outcomes in reverse-sequence endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with or without direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Patient Satisfaction with Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Followed by Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients Using the BREAST-Q Scale 2.0 Vietnamese Version.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Postoperative breast function and quality of life follow-up study in patients with plasma cell mastitis: a 1-year longitudinal analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Skin-Reducing Mastectomy and Implant Reconstruction: Long-Term Surgical, Oncological, and Patient-Reported Outcomes.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Health-Related Quality of Life in Women Carrying Genetic Variants Associated with Breast Cancer Risk: A Descriptive Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy With Immediate Breast Reconstruction Lowers Concerns of Breast Cancer in Women With a High-Risk Genetic Predisposition for Breast Cancer Compared With a Radiological Imaging Surveillance Group.Journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Aesthetic Breast Reconstruction With De-epidermized Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap and Thoracoabdominal Advancement Flap.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Quality of life after risk reducing mastectomy in a Portuguese cohort of BRCA pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant carriers.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe BREAST-Q is a patient-reported outcome instrument used to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery and reconstruction. Normative values for the BREAST-Q breast cancer modules have not been established, limiting data interpretation.
methodsParticipants were recruited by means of the Army of Women, an online community of women (with and without breast cancer), to complete Mastectomy, Breast Conserving Therapy, and Reconstruction preoperative BREAST-Q scales. Inclusion criteria were women aged 18 years or older without a history of breast surgery or breast cancer. Analysis included descriptive statistics, a linear multivariate regression, and a comparison of the generated normative data to previously published BREAST-Q findings.
resultsThe BREAST-Q was completed by 1201 women. The mean patient age was 54 ± 13 years, mean body mass index 26 ± 6 kg/m, and 38 percent (n = 455) had a bra cup size of D or greater. Mean ± SD scores for BREAST-Q scales were as follows: Satisfaction with Breasts (58 ± 18), Psychosocial Well-being (71 ± 18), Sexual Well-being (56 ± 18), Physical Well-being-Chest (93 ± 11), and Physical Well-being Abdomen (78 ± 20). Women with a body mass index of 30 kg/m or greater, cup size of D or greater, age younger than 40 years, and annual income less than $40,000 reported lower scores. Comparing normative scores to published data in breast cancer patients, Satisfaction with Breasts scores were higher after autologous reconstruction and lower after mastectomy; Sexual Well-being scores were lower after mastectomy and breast conserving therapy; and Physical Well-being Chest scores were lower after mastectomy, breast conserving therapy, and reconstruction.
conclusionThese are the first published normative scores for the BREAST-Q breast cancer modules and provide a clinical reference point for the interpretation of data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.