Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28445351›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2017

Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.

Lily R Mundy, Karen Homa, Anne F Klassen, Andrea L Pusic, Carolyn L Kerrigan

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02601027 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase III Study of Pre-operative Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocks Using the Nimbus Ambulatory Infusion System in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Free Flap-based Breast Reconstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2015 to 2021Enrolled120ConditionsBreast - FemaleArmsTransversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) block, Nimbus Infusion Pump IV Administration, Bupivacaine infusion, Acetominophen, Hydromorphone
NCT03345420 phase2completednot on this map

NOVEMBER (Novem- (9), BrEast Radiation), A Phase II Trial of a 9 Day Course of Whole Breast Radiotherapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2017 to 2025Enrolled102ConditionsDuctal Breast Carcinoma In Situ, Invasive Breast Carcinoma, Stage 0 Breast Cancer, Stage I Breast CancerArmsHypofractionated Radiation Therapy
NCT03777852 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Emotional Evaluation and Reconstructed Breast Satisfaction After Breast Cancer Treatment: Breast Q Questionary

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2019 to 2022Enrolled110ConditionsMalignant Neoplasm of the BreastArmsFirst Questionnaire application, Second Questionnaire application
NCT05724758 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Patient Reported Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorBrust-Zentrum AGRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsBreast Cancer Stage I, Breast Cancer Stage II, Breast Cancer in SituArmsBreast-conserving surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 201 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. The growing high-risk population.American journal of surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Garment-related patient-reported outcomes: a longitudinal pre-post comparison of autologous versus implant-based breast reconstruction.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lily R MundyDurham, N.C.; Lebanon, N.H.; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and New York, N.Y.
Karen HomaDurham, N.C.; Lebanon, N.H.; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and New York, N.Y.
Anne F KlassenDurham, N.C.; Lebanon, N.H.; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and New York, N.Y.
Andrea L PusicDurham, N.C.; Lebanon, N.H.; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and New York, N.Y.
Carolyn L KerriganDurham, N.C.; Lebanon, N.H.; Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; and New York, N.Y.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe BREAST-Q is a patient-reported outcome instrument used to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery and reconstruction. Normative values for the BREAST-Q breast cancer modules have not been established, limiting data interpretation.

methodsParticipants were recruited by means of the Army of Women, an online community of women (with and without breast cancer), to complete Mastectomy, Breast Conserving Therapy, and Reconstruction preoperative BREAST-Q scales. Inclusion criteria were women aged 18 years or older without a history of breast surgery or breast cancer. Analysis included descriptive statistics, a linear multivariate regression, and a comparison of the generated normative data to previously published BREAST-Q findings.

resultsThe BREAST-Q was completed by 1201 women. The mean patient age was 54 ± 13 years, mean body mass index 26 ± 6 kg/m, and 38 percent (n = 455) had a bra cup size of D or greater. Mean ± SD scores for BREAST-Q scales were as follows: Satisfaction with Breasts (58 ± 18), Psychosocial Well-being (71 ± 18), Sexual Well-being (56 ± 18), Physical Well-being-Chest (93 ± 11), and Physical Well-being Abdomen (78 ± 20). Women with a body mass index of 30 kg/m or greater, cup size of D or greater, age younger than 40 years, and annual income less than $40,000 reported lower scores. Comparing normative scores to published data in breast cancer patients, Satisfaction with Breasts scores were higher after autologous reconstruction and lower after mastectomy; Sexual Well-being scores were lower after mastectomy and breast conserving therapy; and Physical Well-being Chest scores were lower after mastectomy, breast conserving therapy, and reconstruction.

conclusionThese are the first published normative scores for the BREAST-Q breast cancer modules and provide a clinical reference point for the interpretation of data.

Indexed as

MammaplastyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedPatient Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID28445351
PMCPMC5713639
OpenAlexW2609082328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.