SynthesisMedicine2017
The efficacy and safety of epinephrine for postoperative bleeding in total joint arthroplasty: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies of Pharmacological Interventions: A Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid plus diluted epinephrine to control blood loss during total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Topically Applied Tranexamic Acid with Epinephrine in Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review.European burn journal · 2025Review
- Consensus document on the management of wound closure in orthopaedic surgery.EFORT open reviews · 2025Review
- Periarticular infiltration used in total joint replacements: an update and review article.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Review
- Does epinephrine use reduce perioperative blood loss during pelvic and femoral osteotomy with open reduction of the patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTotal joint arthroplasty (TJA) usually results in postoperative bleeding. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (non-RCTs) have been performed to evaluate the effects of epinephrine on postoperative bleeding after TJA. However, this remained controversial about the efficacy and safety of epinephrine for postoperative bleeding in TJA. The objective of our meta-analysis was to compare the overall effect and safety of epinephrine and placebo for postoperative bleeding in TJA.
methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify potentially relevant articles. RCTs or non-RCTs involving epinephrine and placebo for blood loss in total knee arthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty were included. Our study was performed based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. RevMan v5.3 was used to analyze the relevant data.
resultsFour RCTs and 1 non-RCT involving 646 participants met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled results from meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with control groups, epinephrine groups could significantly reduce the postoperative bleeding volume (mean difference [MD] = -168.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -272.37 to -64.47, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding volume between epinephrine and control groups (MD = -12.89, 95% CI: -53.45 to 27.69, P = 0.53). No significant difference was found between 2 groups in terms of postoperative hemoglobin loss (MD = -0.28, 95% CI: -0.66 to 0.10, P = 0.15). Compared with the control groups, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of postoperative transfusion rate in epinephrine groups (relative risk [RR] 0.86, 95% CI: 0.64-1.15, P = 0.31). In addition, the results of the meta-analysis also indicated no significant difference in terms of the incidence rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) between 2 groups (RR 0.28, 95% CI: 0.05-1.64, P = 0.16).
conclusionThe meta-analysis showed that epinephrine could significantly reduce postoperative bleeding volume in TJA without increasing the incidence of DVT. However, there was no significant reduction in intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hemoglobin loss, and transfusion rate after the administration of epinephrine. LIMITATIONS: In this study, a higher heterogeneity and a risk of selection bias may be present in postoperative hemoglobin loss. In addition, the sample size of the included studies was too small, so our findings need to be further validated with more high-quality and larger scale RCTs in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.