Observational studyMedicine2017
Barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage C hepatocellular carcinoma: A novel approach to subclassification and treatment.
Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the clinical utility of large language models for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment recommendations: A nationwide retrospective registry study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Radiomics-based prediction of HCC response to atezolizumab/bevacizumab.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Digestive cancers: mechanisms, therapeutics and management.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Advances in post-operative prognostic models for hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2023Review
- Survival Benefit of Experience of Liver Resection for Advanced Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Sorafenib: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- How to optimize the treatment strategy for advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with macrovascular invasion.Journal of liver cancer · 2023Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib in first line treatment for Chinese subpopulation with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Resubclassification and clinical management for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage C hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatology international · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- The Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of the Combination of TACE and Apatinib for the Treatment of BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Impact of Extrahepatic Metastases on Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Liver Dominant Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Subanalysis of the SORAMIC Trial.Liver cancer · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Perfusion Magnetic Resonance as a Biomarker for Sorafenib-Treated Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pilot Study.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Sorafenib with concurrent multiple-line therapies improves overall survival in advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Medicine · 2019Article
- Safety and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with raltitrexed and oxaliplatin post-transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of interventional medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Barcelona clinic liver cancer-stage C (BCLC-C) encompasses a broad spectrum of tumor burdens, liver function statuses, patient prognoses, and treatment strategies. Currently, sorafenib is the only recommended treatment for patients with BCLC-C and outcomes remain suboptimal. The aims of this study were to assess the heterogeneity of BCLC-C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases, propose a novel subclassification for these cases, and suggest optimal treatment strategies other than sorafenib.We retrospectively analyzed 196 consecutive BCLC-C HCC patients who were diagnosed and treated between January 2008 and December 2015.All 196 patients were classified according to the modified Union for International Cancer Control (Stage I, 0.0%; Stage II, 8.2%; Stage III, 64.3%; Stage IVA, 21.9%; and Stage IVB, 5.6%) and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging systems (Stage I, 0.0%; Stage II, 16.3%; Stage IIIA, 27.6%; Stage IIIB, 49.5%; Stage IIIC, 1.5%; Stage IVA, 1.0%; and Stage IVB, 4.1%). First-line treatment modalities included surgical resection (8.7%), transarterial chemoembolization (49.5%), hepatic arterial infusion therapy (5.6%), sorafenib therapy (9.2%), radiotherapy (9.2%), and best supportive care (10.7%). In univariate analysis, Child-Pugh score, tumor size, distant metastasis, multinodular or infiltrative/diffuse type of HCC, main portal vein invasion, hepatic vein invasion, and bile duct invasion were significantly associated with survival (P < .001). Tumor size, distant metastasis, HCC type, and bile duct invasion remained significantly associated with 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates in multivariate Cox regression analyses. Using these 4 characteristics, a novel subclassification of BCLC-C was developed and applied to the patient cohort. The subclassification included 5 substages (stages C0-C4), as defined based on the number of characteristics that were present in each HCC case (0-4). The subclassification showed significant associations with survival, with median survival times of 3026 days, 605 days, 224 days, 126 days, and 82 days for patients with Stage C0, C1, C2, C3, and C4 disease, respectively (P < .001). Additionally, diverse survival rates were observed when different treatment modalities were selected for cases within each substage.The proposed BCLC-C subclassification of HCC patients is effective in providing better prognostic subclassifications and more appropriate treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.