Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444962›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2017

Fine-scale species distribution changes in a mixed oak stand over two successive generations.

Laura Truffaut, Emilie Chancerel, Alexis Ducousso, Jean Luc Dupouey, Vincent Badeau, François Ehrenmann, Antoine Kremer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oaks: an evolutionary success story.The New phytologist · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Tree genetics & genomes · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura TruffautUMR 1202 BIOGECO, INRA, Cestas, F-33610, France.
Emilie ChancerelUMR 1202 BIOGECO, INRA, Cestas, F-33610, France.
Alexis DucoussoUMR 1202 BIOGECO, INRA, Cestas, F-33610, France.
Jean Luc DupoueyINRA Université de Lorraine UMR 1137 'Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières', route d'Amance, Champenoux, F-54280, France.
Vincent BadeauINRA Université de Lorraine UMR 1137 'Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières', route d'Amance, Champenoux, F-54280, France.
François EhrenmannUMR 1202 BIOGECO, INRA, Cestas, F-33610, France.
Antoine KremerUMR 1202 BIOGECO, INRA, Cestas, F-33610, France.

Funding

European Research Council 339728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale tree distribution changes have received considerable attention but underlying demo-genetic mechanisms are less well documented. We used a diachronic approach to track species shifts in a mixed oak stand (Quercus petraea-Quercus robur) at a fine spatiotemporal scale. Species assignment was made using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) fingerprints employing clustering and parentage analysis. Mating patterns and reproductive success were assessed by parentage analysis. Plot-based inventories of soil parameters and sapling densities provided ecological and demographic information, respectively. Sapling density and reproductive success was higher in Q. petraea than in Q. robur, and were correlated with a spatial expansion of Q. petraea (50% to 67% of the area). Admixed trees resulting from hybridization and backcrossing between the two species were more frequent under the Q. robur canopy. We suspect that species' differential responses to ongoing environmental changes and interspecific competition are the predominant factors accounting for the recruitment success of Q. petraea, while human interference, differential reproduction and hybridization (and backcrossings) are probably of more limited importance. We anticipate in mixed Q. petraea-Q. robur stands, under current ongoing environmental change, that these processes will be enhanced, at least in the western part of the distribution of the two species.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingEnvironmentHybridization, GeneticInbreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DynamicsQuercusReproductionSpecies SpecificityadmixturedemographyQuercus petraeaQuercus roburrecruitmentregeneration phase

Identifiers

PMID28444962
PMCPMC5624485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.