Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444760›Full record

Observational studyActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2017

Vancomycin levels are frequently subtherapeutic in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.

V Bakke, H Sporsem, E Von der Lippe, I Nordøy, Y Lao, H C Nyrerød, L Sandvik, K R Hårvig, J F Bugge, E Helset

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. DeepTDM: Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Sequential Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Levels of Vancomycin.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

V BakkeFaculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6644-0995
H SporsemOslo Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway.
E Von der LippeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital - Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway.
I NordøySection for Clinical Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
Y LaoOslo Hospital Pharmacy, Oslo, Norway.
H C NyrerødDepartment of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
L SandvikOslo Center for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Research support services, Oslo, Norway.
K R HårvigDepartment of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
J F BuggeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
E HelsetDepartment of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital - Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate utilization of vancomycin is important to attain therapeutic targets while avoiding clinical failure and the development of antimicrobial resistance. Our aim was to observe the use of vancomycin in an intensive care population, with the main focus on achievement of therapeutic serum concentrations (15-20 mg/l) and to evaluate how this was influenced by dose regimens, use of guidelines and therapeutic drug monitoring.

methodsA prospective observational study was carried out in the intensive care units at two tertiary hospitals in Norway. Data were collected from 83 patients who received vancomycin therapy, half of these received continuous renal replacement therapy. Patients were followed for 72 h after initiation of therapy. Blood samples were drawn for analysis of trough serum concentrations. Urine was collected for calculations of creatinine clearance. Information was gathered from medical records and electronic health records.

resultsLess than 40% of the patients attained therapeutic trough serum concentrations during the first 3 days of therapy. Patients with augmented renal clearance had lower serum trough concentrations despite receiving higher maintenance doses and more loading doses. When trough serum concentrations were outside of therapeutic range, dose adjustments in accordance to therapeutic drug monitoring were made to less than half.

conclusionThe present study reveals significant challenges in the utilization of vancomycin in critically ill patients. There is a need for clearer guidelines regarding dosing and therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin for patient subgroups.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineCritical CareDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug MonitoringDrug Resistance, MicrobialFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayProspective StudiesRenal Replacement TherapyAnti-Bacterial AgentsCreatinineVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID28444760
PMCPMC5485054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.