Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444643›Full record

ArticleAmbio2017

Fostering incidental experiences of nature through green infrastructure planning.

Thomas H Beery, Christopher M Raymond, Marketta Kyttä, Anton Stahl Olafsson, Tobias Plieninger, Mattias Sandberg, Marie Stenseke, Maria Tengö, K Ingemar Jönsson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas H BeerySchool of Education and Environment, Kristianstad University, 291 88, Kristianstad, Sweden. thomas.beery@hkr.se.
Christopher M RaymondDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 58, Alnarp, Sweden.
Marketta KyttäAalto University, Department of Built Environment, P.O. Box 14100, 00076, Aalto, Finland.
Anton Stahl OlafssonDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Tobias PlieningerDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Mattias SandbergUnit for Human Geography, Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 625, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Marie StensekeUnit for Human Geography, Department of Economy and Society, University of Gothenburg, P.O. Box 625, 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Maria TengöStockholm Resilience Center, Stockholm, Sweden.
K Ingemar JönssonSchool of Education and Environment, Kristianstad University, 291 88, Kristianstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concern for a diminished human experience of nature and subsequent decreased human well-being is addressed via a consideration of green infrastructure's potential to facilitate unplanned or incidental nature experience. Incidental nature experience is conceptualized and illustrated in order to consider this seldom addressed aspect of human interaction with nature in green infrastructure planning. Special attention has been paid to the ability of incidental nature experience to redirect attention from a primary activity toward an unplanned focus (in this case, nature phenomena). The value of such experience for human well-being is considered. The role of green infrastructure to provide the opportunity for incidental nature experience may serve as a nudge or guide toward meaningful interaction. These ideas are explored using examples of green infrastructure design in two Nordic municipalities: Kristianstad, Sweden, and Copenhagen, Denmark. The outcome of the case study analysis coupled with the review of literature is a set of sample recommendations for how green infrastructure can be designed to support a range of incidental nature experiences with the potential to support human well-being.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcologyAnimalsCitiesConservation of Natural ResourcesDenmarkHumansSwedenExtinction of experienceHuman well-beingIncidental nature experienceIntentional nature experienceNudgingRedirection of attention

Identifiers

PMID28444643
PMCPMC5622884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.