Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444640›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2017

Diagnostic value of the dual-luciferase report assay for predicting response to glucocorticoid in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

X Wang, P Chen, Y Sun, Y Chen, M Mao, T Jiang, J Ouyang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

X WangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
P ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Y SunDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Y ChenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
M MaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
T JiangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. jiangtangandwang@163.com.
J OuyangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. ouyangjuanandwang@163.com.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 81101316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResistance to glucocorticoid (GC) is a significant clinical problem in some cases of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Current methods of assessing GC resistance are time consuming and have limited reproducibility; in this study, we sought to define a new method of evaluating GC sensitivity and resistance in vitro.

methodsBased on the mechanisms of GC resistance, we hypothesized that the dual-luciferase report (DLR) assay could reflect the transcription effects of GC downstream of the GC-glucocorticoid receptor signaling pathway, thereby allowing the evaluation of reactions to GC. Sixty-two patients with differential GC response were included in this study. The prednisone induction test was used to divide the children with ALL into two groups: GC sensitive (GCS) and GC resistant (GCR). DLR assay was later conducted on those patients to evaluate its value for diagnosis of the GC reactivity. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to identify the optimal assay cutoff for identifying response to GC.

resultsUsing the DLR assay analysis, we found that GCR subjects showed significantly lower reporter/control ratios for luciferase, as compared with GCS subjects. The optimal cutoff value for GC response was 0.67, with sensitivity of 77.1% and specificity of 93.3%. The DLR assay results were consistent with prednisone induction test results. Further, the DLR assay was simpler, more sensitive, and less time-consuming than the prednisone induction test.

conclusionsOur study showed that the DLR assay is relatively fast, simple, and sensitive. Accordingly, it could be useful for detecting GC response in children with ALL.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHumansInfantLuciferasesMaleMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrednisonePrognosisReceptors, GlucocorticoidGlucocorticoidsLuciferasesPrednisoneReceptors, GlucocorticoidAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaDual-luciferase report assayGlucocorticoidPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28444640
OpenAlexW2608489104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.