Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444633›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2018

Distributed representations of action sequences in anterior cingulate cortex: A recurrent neural network approach.

Danesh Shahnazian, Clay B Holroyd

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Perceptual oddities: assessing the relationship between film editing and prediction processes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Gain control explains the effect of distraction in human perceptual, cognitive, and economic decision making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. Human midcingulate cortex encodes distributed representations of task progress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danesh ShahnazianDepartment of Psychology, University of Victoria, P. O. Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Clay B HolroydDepartment of Psychology, University of Victoria, P. O. Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 2Y2, Canada. holroyd@uvic.ca.
University of Victoria · CA

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant (312409-05)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) has been the subject of intense debate over the past 2 decades, but its specific computational function remains controversial. Here we present a simple computational model of ACC that incorporates distributed representations across a network of interconnected processing units. Based on the proposal that ACC is concerned with the execution of extended, goal-directed action sequences, we trained a recurrent neural network to predict each successive step of several sequences associated with multiple tasks. In keeping with neurophysiological observations from nonhuman animals, the network yields distributed patterns of activity across ACC neurons that track the progression of each sequence, and in keeping with human neuroimaging data, the network produces discrepancy signals when any step of the sequence deviates from the predicted step. These simulations illustrate a novel approach for investigating ACC function.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAnimalsGoalsGyrus CinguliHumansModels, NeurologicalMotivationNeuronsAnterior cingulate cortexRecurrent neural networkSequence learningSurprise

Identifiers

PMID28444633
OpenAlexW2609213948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.