Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444617›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2017

Computational Theory Underlying Acute Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Motor Learning with Cerebellar Long-Term Depression and Long-Term Potentiation.

Keiichiro Inagaki, Yutaka Hirata

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Flexible Coupling of Synaptic and Intrinsic Plasticity in a Cerebellar Circuit.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Effect of convergence on the horizontal VOR in normal subjects and patients with peripheral and central vestibulopathy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Time Is Cerebellum.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Keiichiro InagakiDepartment of Robotic Science and Technology, College of Engineering, Chubu University, 1200 Matsumoto, Kasugai, Aichi, 487-8501, Japan. kay@isc.chubu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-4632-9819
Yutaka HirataDepartment of Robotic Science and Technology, College of Engineering, Chubu University, 1200 Matsumoto, Kasugai, Aichi, 487-8501, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) can be viewed as an adaptive control system that maintains compensatory eye movements during head motion. As the cerebellar flocculus is intimately involved in this adaptive motor control of the VOR, the VOR has been a popular model system for investigating cerebellar motor learning. Long-term depression (LTD) and long-term potentiation (LTP) at the parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses are considered to play major roles in cerebellar motor learning. A recent study using mutant mice demonstrated cerebellar motor learning with hampered LTD; the study concluded that the parallel fiber-Purkinje cell LTD is not essential. More recently, multiple forms of plasticity have been found in the cerebellum, and they are believed to contribute to cerebellar motor learning. However, it is still unclear how synaptic plasticity modifies the signal processing that underlies motor learning in the flocculus. A computational simulation suggested that the plasticity present in mossy fiber-granule cell synapses improves VOR-related sensory-motor information transferred into granule cells, whereas the plasticity in the molecular layer stores this information as a memory under guidance from climbing fiber teaching signals. Thus, motor learning and memory are thought to be induced mainly by LTD and LTP at parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses and by rebound potentiation at molecular interneuron-Purkinje cell synapses among the multiple forms of plasticity in the cerebellum. In this study, we focused on the LTD and LTP at parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synapses. Based on our simulation, we propose that acute VOR motor learning accomplishes by simultaneous enhancement of eye movement signals via LTP and suppression of vestibular signals via LTD to increase VOR gain (gain-up learning). To decrease VOR gain (gain-down learning), these two signals are modified in the opposite directions; namely, LTD suppresses eye movement signals, whereas LTP enhances vestibular signals.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationAction PotentialsAnimalsCerebellumEye Movement MeasurementsLearningLong-Term PotentiationLong-Term Synaptic DepressionMicroelectrodesModels, NeurologicalMotor ActivityReflex, Vestibulo-OcularSaimiriSynapsesVisual PerceptionCerebellar flocculusComputer simulationSignal selectionSpike timing-dependent plasticitySpiking neuron network model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.