Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444558›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

Evolution of Surgical Treatment for Rectal Cancer: a Review.

Sanjeev Dayal, Nick Battersby, Tom Cecil

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Step-wise learning of laparoscopic low anterior resection.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Non-operative management of rectal cancer.Seminars in colon & rectal surgery · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Surgical specimen extractionWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sanjeev DayalDepartment of Surgery & Peritoneal malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6571-5344
Nick BattersbyDepartment of Surgery & Peritoneal malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK.
Tom CecilDepartment of Surgery & Peritoneal malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, RG24 9NA, UK. tom.cecil@nhs.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgery that produces an optimal total mesorectal excision (TME) resection specimen remains the cornerstone of curative rectal cancer management. In the modern era, despite the results of recent randomised trials, laparoscopic TME is a crucial technique in the TME surgery armamentarium. Laparoscopic surgery offers the benefit of magnified views that aid sharp and precise dissection. However operating in the confines of a narrow pelvis, particularly when the mesorectum is bulky, requires significant technical skill. This is compounded by limited angulation of laparoscopic instruments and staplers. The final challenge is to preserve the integrity of the mesorectum during delivery of the specimen. The principles of TME surgery, on which Bill Heald founded the Basingstoke Colorectal unit, can equally be applied to laparoscopic, transanal and robotic TME, but great care must be taken to preserve the key principle-that no steps are taken that have the potential to shed tumour cells or compromise the quality of the mesorectal specimen.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansRectal NeoplasmsLaparoscopicRectal cancerRoboticTotal mesorectal excisionTransanal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.