ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2017
Evaluating the effectiveness of a novel atomized liquid needle-free transdermal delivery system.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Needle-free jet injections constitute a crucial method for drug delivery. A novel liquid drug delivery system has been proposed recently, in which pressure atomizes liquid before delivering that atomized liquid to the patient's body; however, the mechanism and efficiency of the system are unclear. This study explored the shot delivery pressure, penetration depth, and cumulative amount of permeation of this system. This system was used to deliver 0.5% (w/v) methylene blue to agarose phantoms at various shot delivery pressures. Shots of methylene blue were also delivered to porcine skin samples at different shot delivery frequencies for light microscopy evaluation. A commercial microneedle array was used for comparing the effectiveness of the skin penetration depths. The array was gently stamped against porcine skin; methylene blue was subsequently applied to the area for different time points, followed by microscopic observations. In vitro skin penetration was tested using static Franz diffusion cells over 8 h. Finally, the feasibility of the system's clinical application was evaluated by analyzing the local analgesic effect in a heat nociceptive animal model. The penetration depths created using 100 shots at 100 psi were similar to those created using the commercial microneedle array for 2 h. Thermal stimulation responses showed that 15 min after diclofenac sodium was delivered by the system, heat nociception was significantly attenuated for 60 min. Our study presents a novel delivery system that may be useful for future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.