Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444473›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental geochemistry and health2017

Contrasting effects of engineered carbon nanotubes on plants: a review.

Meththika Vithanage, Mihiri Seneviratne, Mahtab Ahmad, Binoy Sarkar, Yong Sik Ok

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Combined Toxicity of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and CuNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The effects of multiwalled carbon nanotubes andFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Meththika VithanageEnvironmental Chemodynamics Project, National Institute of Fundamental Studies, Kandy, Sri Lanka. meththikavithanage@gmail.com.
Mihiri SeneviratneDepartment of Botany, The Open University of Sri Lanka, Nawala, Sri Lanka.
Mahtab AhmadDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan.
Binoy SarkarFuture Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, 5095, Australia.
Yong Sik OkKorea Biochar Research Center and Department of Biological Environment, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, 200-701, Korea. soilok@kangwon.ac.kr.
Indiana University Bloomington · USKangwon National University · KRNational Institute of Fundamental Studies · LKOpen University of Sri Lanka · LKQuaid-i-Azam University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid surge of interest for carbon nanotube (CNT) in the last decade has made it an imperative member of nanomaterial family. Because of the distinctive physicochemical properties, CNTs are widely used in a number of scientific applications including plant sciences. This review mainly describes the role of CNT in plant sciences. Contradictory effects of CNT on plants physiology are reported. CNT can act as plant growth inducer causing enhanced plant dry biomass and root/shoot lengths. At the same time, CNT can cause negative effects on plants by forming reactive oxygen species in plant tissues, consequently leading to cell death. Enhanced seed germination with CNT is related to the water uptake process. CNT can be positioned as micro-tubes inside the plant body to enhance the water uptake efficiency. Due to its ability to act as a slow-release fertilizer and plant growth promoter, CNT is transpiring as a novel nano-carbon fertilizer in the field of agricultural sciences. On the other hand, accumulation of CNT in soil can cause deleterious effects on soil microbial diversity, composition and population. It can further modify the balance between plant-toxic metals in soil, thereby enhancing the translocation of heavy metal(loids) into the plant system. The research gaps that need careful attention have been identified in this review.

Indexed as

BiomassFertilizersFullerenesGerminationPesticidesPlant DevelopmentPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant Physiological PhenomenaPlantsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSeedsSoil MicrobiologyWaterFertilizersFullerenesPesticidesPlant Growth RegulatorsReactive Oxygen SpeciesWaterCarbon nanotubeFullerenePlant growthSeed germinationSlow-release fertilizerSoil microorganisms

Identifiers

PMID28444473
OpenAlexW2609132213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.