Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444467›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2018

The role of perspective in discriminating between social and non-social intentions from reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Francesca Ciardo, Isabella Campanini, Andrea Merlo, Sandro Rubichi, Cristina Iani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca CiardoDepartment of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Allegri 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Isabella CampaniniMotion Analysis Laboratory, Rehabilitation Department, AUSL of Reggio Emilia, Via Mandriolo Superiore 11, 42015, Correggio, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Andrea MerloMotion Analysis Laboratory, Rehabilitation Department, AUSL of Reggio Emilia, Via Mandriolo Superiore 11, 42015, Correggio, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Sandro RubichiDepartment of Education and Human Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Allegri 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Cristina IaniDepartment of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Allegri 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy. cristina.iani@unimore.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7220-6337
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

Università Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emila FAR2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Making correct inferences regarding social and individual intentions may be crucial for successful interactions, especially when we are required to discriminate between cooperative and competitive behaviors. The results of previous studies indicate that reach-to-grasp kinematic parameters may be used to infer the social or individual outcome of a movement. However, the majority of the studies investigated this ability by presenting reach-to-grasp movements from a third-person perspective only. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the ability to recognize the intent associated to a reach-to-grasp movement varies as a function of perspective by manipulating the perspective of observation (second- and third-perspective) within participants. To this end, we presented participants with video clips of models performing a reach-to-grasp movement with different intents. The video clips were recorded both from a lateral view (third-person perspective) and from a frontal view (second-person perspective). After viewing the clips, in two subsequent tasks participants were asked to distinguish between social and non-social intentions by observing the initial phase of the same action recorded from the two different views. Results showed that, when a fast-speed movement was presented from a lateral view, participants were able to predict its social intention. In contrast, when the same movement was observed from a frontal view, performance was impaired. These results indicate that the ability to detect social intentions from motor cues can be biased by the visual perspective of the observer, specifically for fast-speed movements.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalIntentionSocial BehaviorBiomechanical PhenomenaCuesFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleMovementYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28444467
OpenAlexW2609154604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.