Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444439›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2017

Back to the Future - Part 2. Post-mortem assessment and evolutionary role of the bio-medicolegal sciences.

Santo Davide Ferrara, Giovanni Cecchetto, Rossana Cecchi, Donata Favretto, Silke Grabherr, Takaki Ishikawa, Toshikazu Kondo, Massimo Montisci, Heidi Pfeiffer, Maurizio Rippa Bonati and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Methodology for the identification of vulnerable asylum seekers.International journal of legal medicine · 2017
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Santo Davide FerraraDepartment of Legal and Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Public Health, University-Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy. santodavide.ferrara@unipd.it.
Giovanni CecchettoDepartment of Legal and Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Public Health, University-Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Rossana CecchiDepartment of Biomedical, Biotechnological and Translational Medicine, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Donata FavrettoDepartment of Legal and Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Public Health, University-Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Silke GrabherrUniversity Center of Legal Medicine Lausanne-Geneva, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Takaki IshikawaDepartment of Legal Medicine, Osaka City University Medical School, Osaka, Japan.
Toshikazu KondoDepartment of Forensic Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Massimo MontisciDepartment of Legal and Occupational Medicine, Toxicology and Public Health, University-Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Heidi PfeifferInstitute of Legal Medicine, University-Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Maurizio Rippa BonatiDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Section of Medical Humanities, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Dina ShokryDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, University of Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.
Marielle VennemannInstitute of Legal Medicine, University-Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Thomas BajanowskiInstitute of Legal Medicine, University-Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Part 2 of the review "Back to the Future" is dedicated to the evolutionary role of the bio-medicolegal sciences, reporting the historical profiles, the state of the art, and prospects for future development of the main related techniques and methods of the ancillary disciplines that have risen to the role of "autonomous" sciences, namely, Genetics and Genomics, Toxicology, Radiology, and Imaging, involved in historic synergy in the "post-mortem assessment," together with the mother discipline Legal Medicine, by way of its primary fundament, universally denominated as Forensic Pathology. The evolution of the scientific research and the increased accuracy of the various disciplines will be oriented towards the elaboration of an "algorithm," able to weigh the value of "evidence" placed at the disposal of the "justice system" as real truth and proof.

Indexed as

Chemistry Techniques, AnalyticalDatabases, Nucleic AcidDNA FingerprintingForecastingForensic ToxicologyHumansMetabolomicsMicrosatellite RepeatsPharmacogenomic VariantsPolymerase Chain ReactionProteomicsSpecimen HandlingBio-Medicolegal sciences - Forensic PathologyForensic autopsyGenetics and genomicsMedicolegal autopsyPost-mortem assessmentRadiology and imagingToxicology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.