Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444350›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2017

Reliability, Validity, and Minimal Detectable Change of Four-Step Stair Climb Power Test in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Meng Ni, Lorna G Brown, Danielle Lawler, Jonathan F Bean

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. A Systematic Review of Stair Fall Risk Assessment Instruments in Older Adults.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Author response to OSIN-D-26-00532: self-paced stair climb and handrail use may mask links to injurious falls.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Exoskeletal-Assisted Training in Veterans With Chronic Stroke: A Pilot Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meng NiSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 1575 Cambridge St, Cambridge, MA 02138 (USA), and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lorna G BrownSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.
Danielle LawlerSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.
Jonathan F BeanSpaulding Rehabilitation Hospital; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School; and New England GRECC, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

A Research Mentoring Program in the Rehabilitative Care of Older AdultsK24HD070966 · NICHD · SPAULDING REHABILITATION HOSPITAL · PI BEAN, JONATHAN F · 2012 to 2016
$793k
NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD070966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStair climb power is an important clinical measure of lower-extremity power. The stair climb power test (SCPT) was validated by requiring individuals to climb a full flight of stairs. A 4-step SCPT (4SCPT) would be more clinically feasible and easier to perform, yet its reliability and validity are unknown.

objectiveTo evaluate reliability, validity, and minimal detectable change of 4SCPT among community-dwelling older adults.

designThis study is a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from a clinical trial.

methodsFifty older adults ≥65 years of age, at risk for mobility decline, consented to participate in this ancillary study. Test-retest reliability was derived from 2 measurements within each participant measured by a single assessor. Pearson correlation analyses among leg power measures (4SCPT, SCPT, single leg press power at 40% and 70% of the 1-repetition maximum [SLP40, SLP70]) were performed. Separate multivariate linear regressions were conducted evaluating the associations between each leg power measure and 2 mobility outcomes, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and habitual gait speed (HGS). Minimal detectable change was based on a 90% confidence interval (MDC 90 ).

resultsThe 4SCPT had excellent test-retest reliability (ICC(2,1) = 0.951), and strong correlation with SCPT, SLP40, and SLP70 ( r = 0.85-0.96). The 4SCPT explained a greater amount of variance in the SPPB (R 2 = 0.31) than other leg power measurements (R 2 = 0.23-0.25). The 4SCPT (R 2 = 0.41) and SCPT (R 2 = 0.42) described equivalent amounts of variance in HGS, and greater than that with SLP40 (R 2 = 0.28) and SLP70 (R 2 = 0.30). The MDC 90 for 4SCPT was 44.0 watts. LIMITATIONS: This was a cross-sectional analysis within a small, nonrepresentative sample. Interrater reliability was not evaluated.

conclusionsThe 4SCPT shows scientific promise as a valid and reliable leg power measurement among community-dwelling older adults.

Indexed as

Exercise TestAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGaitHumansLower ExtremityMaleMuscle StrengthReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID28444350
PMCPMC6257032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.