Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444278›Full record

ArticleJAMA2017

Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.

Douglas A Corley, Christopher D Jensen, Virginia P Quinn, Chyke A Doubeni, Ann G Zauber, Jeffrey K Lee, Joanne E Schottinger, Amy R Marks, Wei K Zhao, Nirupa R Ghai and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 273 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Screening Delay: Effect on Stage Shift and Increased Mortality.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Precision Patient Navigation to Improve Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy, An Individual Randomized Effectiveness Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Article
  18. Using FIT Thresholds for Priority Triage and Risk Stratification in Resource-Constrained Systems.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Douglas A CorleyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Christopher D JensenDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Virginia P QuinnDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Chyke A DoubeniDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ann G ZauberDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jeffrey K LeeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Joanne E SchottingerDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Amy R MarksDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Wei K ZhaoDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Nirupa R GhaiDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Alexander T LeeDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Richard ContrerasDepartment of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena.
Charles P QuesenberryDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Bruce H FiremanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Theodore R LevinDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Kaiser Permanente · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Optimizing the use of colonoscopy for CRC screening in a large community-basedU54CA163262 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI CORLEY, DOUGLAS ALLEN, DOUBENI, CHYKE ABADAMA · 2011 to 2017
$9.6M
Optimizing long-term post-polypectomy surveillance for colorectal cancer prevention using a prediction rule developed from a large, community-based cohortK07CA212057 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LEE, JEFFREY KUANG ZOU · 2016 to 2020
$869k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA212057NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is commonly used for colorectal cancer screening and positive test results require follow-up colonoscopy. However, follow-up intervals vary, which may result in neoplastic progression.

objectiveTo evaluate time to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result and its association with risk of colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease at diagnosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsRetrospective cohort study (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2014) within Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California. Participants were 70 124 patients aged 50 through 70 years eligible for colorectal cancer screening with a positive FIT result who had a follow-up colonoscopy. EXPOSURES: Time (days) to colonoscopy after a positive FIT result. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Risk of any colorectal cancer and advanced-stage disease (defined as stage III and IV cancer). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were adjusted for patient demographics and baseline risk factors.

resultsOf the 70 124 patients with positive FIT results (median age, 61 years [IQR, 55-67 years]; men, 52.7%), there were 2191 cases of any colorectal cancer and 601 cases of advanced-stage disease diagnosed. Compared with colonoscopy follow-up within 8 to 30 days (n = 27 176), there were no significant differences between follow-up at 2 months (n = 24 644), 3 months (n = 8666), 4 to 6 months (n = 5251), or 7 to 9 months (n = 1335) for risk of any colorectal cancer (cases per 1000 patients: 8-30 days, 30; 2 months, 28; 3 months, 31; 4-6 months, 31; and 7-9 months, 43) or advanced-stage disease (cases per 1000 patients: 8-30 days, 8; 2 months, 7; 3 months, 7; 4-6 months, 9; and 7-9 months, 13). Risks were significantly higher for examinations at 10 to 12 months (n = 748) for any colorectal cancer (OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.05-2.08]; 49 cases per 1000 patients) and advanced-stage disease (OR, 1.97 [95% CI, 1.14-3.42]; 19 cases per 1000 patients) and more than 12 months (n = 747) for any colorectal cancer (OR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.89-2.68]; 76 cases per 1000 patients) and advanced-stage disease (OR, 3.22 [95% CI, 2.44-4.25]; 31 cases per 1000 patients). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with a positive fecal immunochemical test result, compared with follow-up colonoscopy at 8 to 30 days, follow-up after 10 months was associated with a higher risk of colorectal cancer and more advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis. Further research is needed to assess whether this relationship is causal.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyOccult BloodAgedCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28444278
PMCPMC6343838
OpenAlexW2610081401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.