ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2017
Patient safety: knowledge between multiprofessional residents.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Outcomes of a Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Curriculum Between Medical and Nursing Students.Journal of patient safety · 2026Article
- Article
- Is professionalism associated with patient safety attitudes? Insights from a cross-sectional study among medical residents.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring medical and nursing students' perceptions about a patient safety course: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward Patient Safety among nurses in health centers.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Assessment of safety attitudes, professionalism and exploration of medical students' experiences.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Article
- Patient safety: knowledge, influence and attitude among physicians: an exploratory study.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the knowledge of multiprofesional residents in health about the security of the patient theme. Methods: Cross-sectional study, quantitative, developed with graduate courses/residence specialties of health in a public university of Paraná, Brazil. Participants (n=78) answered a questionnaire containing nine objective questions related to patient safety. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, in proportion measures. The minimum 75% of correct answers was considered the cutoff for positive evaluation. Results: The sample was predominantly composed of young people from medical programs. Almost half of the items evaluated (n=5) achieved the established positive pattern, especially those who dealt with the hand hygiene moments (98.8%) and goal of the Patient Safety National Program (92.3%). The identification of the patient was the worst rated item (37.7%). In the analysis by professional areas, only the Nursing reached the standard of hits established. Conclusion: Knowledge of the residents was threshold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.