Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444073›Full record

ArticleRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

Antibacterial activity of standard and N-doped titanium dioxide-coated endotracheal tubes: an in vitro study.

Valentina Caratto, Lorenzo Ball, Elisa Sanguineti, Angelo Insorsi, Iacopo Firpo, Stefano Alberti, Maurizio Ferretti, Paolo Pelosi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tailored TiOACS applied engineering materials · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Antimicrobial Coating: Tracheal Tube Application.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Systematic Comparison of Epidemic and Non-Epidemic Carbapenem ResistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valentina CarattoDipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Lorenzo BallDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Elisa SanguinetiDipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Angelo InsorsiDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Iacopo FirpoDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Stefano AlbertiDipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Maurizio FerrettiDipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Paolo PelosiDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche Integrate, Università degli Studi di Genova, Genova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objective: The aim of this study was to assess the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa of two nanoparticle endotracheal tube coatings with visible light-induced photocatalysis.

methods: Two types of titanium dioxide nanoparticles were tested: standard anatase (TiO2) and N-doped TiO2 (N-TiO2). Nanoparticles were placed on the internal surface of a segment of commercial endotracheal tubes, which were loaded on a cellulose acetate filter; control endotracheal tubes were left without a nanoparticle coating. A bacterial inoculum of 150 colony forming units was placed in the endotracheal tubes and then exposed to a fluorescent light source (3700 lux, 300-700 nm wavelength) for 5, 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 minutes. Colony forming units were counted after 24 hours of incubation at 37°C. Bacterial inactivation was calculated as the percentage reduction of bacterial growth compared to endotracheal tubes not exposed to light.

results: In the absence of light, no relevant antibacterial activity was shown against neither strain. For P. aeruginosa, both coatings had a higher bacterial inactivation than controls at any time point (p < 0.001), and no difference was observed between TiO2 and N-TiO2. For S. aureus, inactivation was higher than for controls starting at 5 minutes for N-TiO2 (p = 0.018) and 10 minutes for TiO2 (p = 0.014); inactivation with N-TiO2 was higher than that with TiO2 at 20 minutes (p < 0.001), 40 minutes (p < 0.001) and 60 minutes (p < 0.001).

conclusions: Nanosized commercial and N-doped TiO2 inhibit bacterial growth under visible fluorescent light. N-TiO2 has higher antibacterial activity against S. aureus compared to TiO2.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsColony Count, MicrobialHumansIntubation, IntratrachealIn Vitro TechniquesLightMetal NanoparticlesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsNitrogenPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureusTime FactorsTitaniumAnti-Bacterial AgentsNitrogenTitaniumtitanium dioxide

Identifiers

PMID28444073
PMCPMC5385986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.