Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28444001›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2017

Birth weight and risk of childhood solid tumors in Brazil: a record linkage between population-based data sets.

Neimar de Paula Silva, Rejane de Souza Reis, Rafael Garcia Cunha, Julio Fernando Oliveira, Fernanda Cristina da Silva de Lima, Maria Socorro Pombo-de-Oliveira, Marceli Oliveira Santos, Beatriz de Camargo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Neimar de Paula SilvaCentro de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Rejane de Souza ReisCentro de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Rafael Garcia CunhaCentro de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Julio Fernando OliveiraCentro de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fernanda Cristina da Silva de LimaCentro de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Maria Socorro Pombo-de-OliveiraCentro de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Marceli Oliveira SantosCentro de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Beatriz de CamargoCentro de Pesquisa, Instituto Nacional de Câncer, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the relationship between the development of childhood solid tumors and 1) birth weight and 2) fetal growth, using two Brazilian population-based data sets.

methodsA case-cohort study was performed using two population-based data sets, and linkage between the Live Birth Information System (Sistema de Informação sobre Nascidos Vivos, SINASC) and 14 population-based cancer registries (PBCRs) was established. Four controls per case were chosen randomly from the SINASC data set. Tumors were classified as central nervous system (CNS), non-CNS embryonal, and other tumors ("miscellaneous"). Adjustments were made for potential confounders (maternal age, mode of delivery, maternal education, birth order, gestational age, sex, and geographic region). Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using unconditional logistic regression analysis.

resultsIn a trend analysis, for every 500 g of additional birth weight, the crude OR was 1.12 (CI: 1.00-1.24) and the adjusted OR was 1.02 (CI: 0.90-1.16) for all tumors. For every 1 000 g of additional birth weight, the crude OR was 1.25 (CI: 1.00-1.55) and the adjusted OR was 1.04 (CI: 0.82-1.34) for all tumors. Among children diagnosed after reaching the age of 3 years, in the miscellaneous tumor category, the OR was significantly increased for every additional 500 g and 1 000 g of birth weight.

conclusionsThe study data suggested that increased birth weight was associated with childhood solid tumor development, especially among children more than 3 years old with "miscellaneous" tumors.

Indexed as

Birth WeightBrazilCase-Control StudiesChildCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansMaleMedical Record LinkageNeoplasmsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID28444001
PMCPMC6660849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.