Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28443292›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2017

Measurements of metastatic renal cell tumours as determined by diffusion weighted imaging or computed tomography are in close agreement, a pilot study.

J Farnebo, C Suzuki, R Vargas-Paris, P Sandström, L Blomqvist

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J FarneboDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
C SuzukiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
R Vargas-ParisDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
P SandströmPrevious: Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Current: Bayer Healthcare, Gustav III:s Boulevard 56, Box 606 Solna Sweden.
L BlomqvistDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) provides both functional and anatomical information regarding tumours but can also be used for tumour detection. Today, tumour treatment response in clinical trials is mainly assessed on Computed Tomography (CT) using established criteria. Despite availability of dedicated software, CT still requires significant manual work for selection and measurement in treatment response evaluation of solid tumours. PURPOSE: To compare the maximum diameter of tumour lesions on CT with the corresponding measurements on diffusion weighted images. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective cohort, metastatic lesions were identified on CT and on DWI in five patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma before and after three months of treatment with pazopanib. Two radiologists independently measured the same lesions on axial CT images and separately also on axial DWI images. The measurements were compared between CT and DWI with respect to the number of target lesions measured, size of the lesions, size reduction due to treatment and the inter-observer variability. Wilcoxon signed rank test, linear regression and Bland-Altman plots were used for statistical analyses.

resultsIn this pilot study, there was no significant inter-observer variability in terms of numbers of lesion selected between CT and DWI. A significant reduction of lesion size was observed both for CT and DWI when post-treatment scans were compared to pre-treatment scans. There was no significant difference in measurement of lesion size on both pre- and post treatment scans between CT and DWI (p = 0.099 and p = 0.388 respectively).

conclusionMeasurement of the size of metastatic lesions on the basis of axial DWI images are in close agreement with measurement based on conventional axial CT images, the most often employed approach in clinical trials today. The results in this pilot study can be used to estimate sufficient sample size in a larger trial with adequate power, were the results can be confirmed in a wider range of cancers other than renal cell carcinoma.

Indexed as

ADC, Apparent Diffusion CoefficientBiomarkerClinical trialsCTCT, Computed TomographyDWIDWI, Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imagingMRI, Magnetic Resonance ImagingRECIST1.1RECIST, The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST)

Identifiers

PMID28443292
PMCPMC5393168
OpenAlexW2605860497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.