Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28443290›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2017

Comparison of a Supraglottic Airway Device (v-gel

Sarah Engbers, Amy Larkin, Nicolas Rousset, Melanie Prebble, Mahesh Jonnalagadda, Cameron G Knight, Daniel S J Pang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Spritztube: A New Device for the Extraglottic Intubation of Rabbits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  5. V-GelFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah EngbersCochrane Veterinary Care Clinic, Cochrane, AB, Canada.
Amy LarkinWestern College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Nicolas RoussetWestern Veterinary Specialist and Emergency Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Melanie PrebbleWestern Veterinary Specialist and Emergency Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mahesh JonnalagaddaUniversity of Cincinatti, Cincinatti, OH, USA.
Cameron G KnightUniversity of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine (UCVM), Calgary, AB, Canada.
Daniel S J PangFaculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAchieving a secure airway in rabbits is generally considered more difficult than in cats or dogs. Their relatively large tongue, small oropharyngeal cavity and glottis limit direct visualization. A rabbit-specific supraglottic airway device (SGAD) may offer benefits over blind orotracheal intubation. ANIMALS AND

methodsFifteen adult New Zealand white rabbits were randomized to SGAD or orotracheal intubation (ETT). All animals were sedated with dexmedetomidine (0.1 mg kg

resultsTwo rabbits were excluded following failed ETT. Body masses were similar [ETT;

conclusionThe SGAD studied was faster to place and caused less damage than orotracheal intubation, but resulted in a similar CSA.

Indexed as

alpha 2 agonistsendotracheal intubationrabbit anesthesiasecure airwaysteroid anesthetic

Identifiers

PMID28443290
PMCPMC5385366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.