ArticleFrontiers in neurology2017
The Vestibular Implant: Hearing Preservation during Intralabyrinthine Electrode Insertion-A Case Report.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04918745 (VertiGO! - Get up and GO! With the Vestibular Implant), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
VertiGO! - Get up and GO! With the Vestibular Implant
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subconscious vibrotactile stimulation improves mobility and balance in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy: adherence over 2 years.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Vestibular prosthesis: from basic research to clinics.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Review
- Etiologies and hearing status in bilateral vestibulopathy: a retrospective study of 315 patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Effect of cochlear implantation on vestibular function in children: A scoping review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Simultaneous activation of multiple vestibular pathways upon electrical stimulation of semicircular canal afferents.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Introducing the DizzyQuest: an app-based diary for vestibular disorders.Journal of neurology · 2020Article
- Influence of systematic variations of the stimulation profile on responses evoked with a vestibular implant prototype in humans.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
- Analysis of Vestibular Labyrinthine Geometry and Variation in the Human Temporal Bone.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Model-based Vestibular Afferent Stimulation: Modular Workflow for Analyzing Stimulation Scenarios in Patient Specific and Statistical Vestibular Anatomy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017Article
- A Hand-Guided Robotic Drill for Vestibular Implant Surgery-Feasibility of Preventing Membranous Labyrinth Rupture.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-facialeArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe vestibular implant seems feasible as a clinically useful device in the near future. However, hearing preservation during intralabyrinthine implantation remains a challenge. It should be preserved to be able to treat patients with bilateral vestibulopathy and (partially) intact hearing. This case study investigated the feasibility of hearing preservation during the acute phase after electrode insertion in the semicircular canals.
methodsA 40-year-old woman with normal hearing underwent a translabyrinthine approach for a vestibular schwannoma Koos Grade IV. Hearing was monitored using auditory brainstem response audiometry (ABR). ABR signals were recorded synchronously to video recordings of the surgery. Following the principles of soft surgery, a conventional dummy electrode was inserted in the lateral semicircular canal for several minutes and subsequently removed. The same procedure was then applied for the posterior canal. Finally, the labyrinthectomy was completed, and the schwannoma was removed.
resultsSurgery was performed without complications. No leakage of endolymph and no significant reduction of ABR response were observed during insertion and after removal of the electrodes from the semicircular canals, indicting no damage to the peripheral auditory function. The ABR response significantly changed when the semicircular canals were completely opened during the labyrinthectomy. This was indicated by a change in the morphology and latency of peak V of the ABR signal.
conclusionElectrode insertion in the semicircular canals is possible without acutely damaging the peripheral auditory function measured with ABR, as shown in this proof-of-principle clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.