ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2017
Evaluating Quality of Decision-Making Processes in Medicines' Development, Regulatory Review, and Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the Quality Decision-Making Practices Utilized by the Zambia Medicines Regulatory Authority Technical Committees.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond the Pill: Mapping Process-Oriented Decision Support Models in Pharmaceutical Policy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessment of compliance with good review practices by medicine assessors within the Zambia medicines regulatory authority.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Implicit factors influencing the HTA deliberative processes in 5 European countries: results from a mixed-methods research.Health policy OPEN · 2023Article
- Methodological guidelines and publications of benefit-risk assessment for health technology assessment: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Article
- A Proposed Regulatory Review Model to Support the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority to Become a More Efficient and Effective Agency.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- A Process for Evaluating Quality Decision-Making Practices During the Development, Review and Reimbursement of Medicines.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- Systematic literature review on the implicit factors influencing the HTA deliberative process in Europe.Journal of market access & health policy · 2022Review
- South African Regulatory Authority: The Impact of Reliance on the Review Process Leading to Improved Patient Access.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Quality Decision-Making Practices in Pharmaceutical Companies and Regulatory Authorities: Current and Proposed Approaches to Its Documentation.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2020Article
- Practical applications of regulatory requirements for signal detection and communications in pharmacovigilance.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2020Review
- The evidence-based choice for antipsychotics in children and adolescents should be guaranteed.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Review
- The Reliability and Relevance of a Quality of Decision Making Instrument, Quality of Decision-Making Orientation Scheme (QoDoS), for Use During the Lifecycle of Medicines.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Do Robotics and Virtual Reality Add Real Progress to Mirror Therapy Rehabilitation? A Scoping Review.Rehabilitation research and practice · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.