Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28443021›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2017

Functional and Biochemical Endothelial Profiling

Anna Bar, Mariola Olkowicz, Urszula Tyrankiewicz, Edyta Kus, Krzysztof Jasinski, Ryszard T Smolenski, Tomasz Skorka, Stefan Chlopicki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A derivative of vitamin BScientific reports · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protective Effects of 1-Methylnicotinamide on AβJournal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Alterations in NO- and PGIBMC cancer · 2018
    Article
  16. Comparison of Pulmonary and Systemic NO- and PGIOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna BarJagiellonian Centre for Experimental Therapeutics, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakow, Poland.
Mariola OlkowiczDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical University of GdanskGdansk, Poland.
Urszula TyrankiewiczJagiellonian Centre for Experimental Therapeutics, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakow, Poland.
Edyta KusJagiellonian Centre for Experimental Therapeutics, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakow, Poland.
Krzysztof JasinskiDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of SciencesKrakow, Poland.
Ryszard T SmolenskiDepartment of Biochemistry, Medical University of GdanskGdansk, Poland.
Tomasz SkorkaDepartment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of SciencesKrakow, Poland.
Stefan ChlopickiJagiellonian Centre for Experimental Therapeutics, Jagiellonian UniversityKrakow, Poland.
Jagiellonian University · PLInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLGdańsk Medical University · PLUniversity of Life Sciences in Poznań · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it is known that 1-methylnicotinamide (MNA) displays vasoprotective activity in mice, as yet the effect of MNA on endothelial function has not been demonstrated

Indexed as

1-methylnicotinamideatherosclerosisendothelial functionL-Arg/ADMA ratioMRIperindoprilplasma angiotensin profile

Identifiers

PMID28443021
PMCPMC5385379
OpenAlexW2604831395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.