ReviewCancer management and research2017
Drainage of malignant ascites: patient selection and perspectives.
Review in Cancer management and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02724683 (Management of Symptomatic Malignant Ascites With an Patient-controlled, Vascular Catheter - a Validation Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Management of Symptomatic Malignant Ascites With an Patient-controlled, Vascular Catheter - a Validation Study.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Phase I/II Clinical Study of PRaG Regimen Combined With Intraperitoneal Infusion of PD-1 Inhibitor for Advanced Refractory Solid Tumors With Cancerous Ascites (PRaG4.0P Study).Technology in cancer research & treatmentTrial
- Neutrophil extracellular traps: the hidden driver of gastrointestinal cancer and emerging therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Development and clinical trial of M701, an Anti-EpCAM × Anti-CD3 bispecific antibody: a targeted intraperitoneal therapy for malignant ascites stemming from advanced solid tumors.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Palliative semi-permanent abdominal drain for the management of refractory malignant ascites: a retrospective study in a comprehensive cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Malignant ascites in ovarian cancer is compatible with long-term (10 year) survival with associations to clinicopathological features.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Cytokine dynamics and quality of life: unraveling the impact of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy in ovarian cancer patients.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels in gastrointestinal cancers with ascites - A cross sectional study.Turkish journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Symptomatic malignant ascites drainage with a patient-controlled vascular catheter: interim analysis of safety and patient-reported outcomes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Linezolid Associated Asymptomatic Hypoglycemia in a Patient with Advanced Gynecologic Cancer: A Case Report and Literature Review.International medical case reports journal · 2025Article
- Prophylactic Intra-abdominal Drains in Major Elective Surgeries: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- The complex role of IL-10 in malignant ascites: a review.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024Review
- Mechanism of ozone alleviation of malignant ascites in hepatocellular carcinoma through the inhibition of neutrophil extracellular traps.PNAS nexus · 2023Article
- Intraperitoneal administration of nanoparticles containing tocopheryl succinate prevents peritoneal dissemination.Cancer science · 2022Article
- MS275 as Class I HDAC inhibitor displayed therapeutic potential on malignant ascites by iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- The Impact of ASCITIC Paracentesis on Symptomatic Outcomes in Palliative Patients: 3-Year Experience of a Melbourne Inpatient Palliative Care Unit Using Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration Assessments.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2022Article
- Palliative long-term abdominal drains for the management of refractory ascites due to cirrhosis: a consensus document.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Mechanical Modulation of Ovarian Cancer Tumor Nodules Under Flow.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Malignant ascites (MA) is a sign of advanced cancer and poor prognosis. MA can result in impairment in quality of life (QOL) and significant symptoms. As a supportive treatment, ascites can be drained by paracentesis (PC), percutaneously implanted catheters (tunneled, untunneled, central venous catheters), or peritoneal ports, or peritoneovenous shunts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of different drainage methods for the management of MA. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and 32 original articles met the inclusion criteria. Patients selected for permanent drain insertion demonstrated symptoms related to MA and had undergone repeated PC. The primary focus of the reviewed articles was procedural safety issues. The rate of technical success of drainage device installation was 100%. Most patients experienced improvements in symptom control after ascites drainage. When analyzed together, 19.7% (255/1297) of patients experienced any complication and 6.2% (81/1297) experienced serious adverse events during MA drainage. Complications were reported for every drainage method; however, the least occurred after PC or central venous catheter, while the most serious occurred after peritoneovenous shunts. Adverse events were as follows: catheter obstruction: 4.4%, infection: 4.1%, leakage: 3.5%, catheter dislodgment: 2.3%, hypotension: 0.6%, injuries during device insertion: 0.6%, renal impairment: 0.5%, electrolyte imbalance: 0.2%, other: 3.6%. PRO and QOL endpoints were available for 12 studies. When PRO were measured using an interview, a significant improvement in symptom control and QOL was reported in almost all patients. Once standardized questionnaires were used, improvements in symptomatic scores and role functioning were observed. Deterioration was observed in cognitive and emotional subscales. MA drainage is a safe and effective method to control symptoms associated with ascites, and should be perceived as a supportive care, that can be applied for those who need it at any time of their cancer trajectory. Patient selection should be performed using a thorough assessment of symptoms and QOL, and should not be delayed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.