Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28442892›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2017

Bioequivalence study of a new sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film compared to the conventional film-coated 100 mg tablet administered to healthy male volunteers.

Milko Radicioni, Chiara Castiglioni, Andrea Giori, Irma Cupone, Valeria Frangione, Stefano Rovati

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Overview about Oral Films in Mental Disorders.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Development and In Vitro Evaluation of Controlled Release ViagraPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Milko RadicioniCROSS Research S.A., Phase I Unit, Arzo, Switzerland.
Chiara CastiglioniCROSS Research S.A., Phase I Unit, Arzo, Switzerland.
Andrea GioriIBSA Farmaceutici Italia, Lodi, Italy.
Irma CuponeBouty S.p.A., Strada Padana Superiore, Cassina De' Pecchi, Italy.
Valeria FrangioneIBSA Institut Biochimique S.A., Pambio-Noranco, Switzerland.
Stefano RovatiIBSA Institut Biochimique S.A., Pambio-Noranco, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new orodispersible film formulation of the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil, has been developed to examine the advantages of an orally disintegrating film formulation and provide an alternative to the current marketed products for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. The pharmacokinetics of the sildenafil 100 mg orodispersible film (IBSA) was compared to that of the conventional marketed 100 mg film-coated tablet (Viagra

Indexed as

Drug CompoundingAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsSildenafil CitrateTabletsTherapeutic EquivalencyYoung AdultPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsSildenafil CitrateTabletsbioequivalenceN-desmethyl-sildenafilorodispersible filmPDE5 inhibitorpharmacokineticssildenafil

Identifiers

PMID28442892
PMCPMC5395281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.