Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28442450›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

Implementing an Internet-Delivered Skin Cancer Genetic Testing Intervention to Improve Sun Protection Behavior in a Diverse Population: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Jennifer L Hay, Marianne Berwick, Kate Zielaskowski, Kirsten Am White, Vivian M Rodríguez, Erika Robers, Dolores D Guest, Andrew Sussman, Yvonne Talamantes, Matthew R Schwartz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Predictors of genetic risk recall among the participants of a randomized controlled precision prevention trial against melanoma.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of Superstitious Beliefs and Risk Intuitions on Genetic Test Decisions.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Interest and Utility ofJournal of skin cancer · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L HayMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3492-9331
Marianne BerwickUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-2180
Kate ZielaskowskiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, New York, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9755-0321
Kirsten Am WhiteUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3701-3430
Vivian M RodríguezCenter for Mind+Body Health, Charlottesville, VA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4560-3449
Erika RobersUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9796-6570
Dolores D GuestUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4981-2750
Andrew SussmanUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2594-8776
Yvonne TalamantesUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-8128
Matthew R SchwartzUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9563-5727
Jennie GrebUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-4489
Jessica BigneyUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2351-9799
Kimberly A KaphingstUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2668-9080
Keith HunleyUniversity of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0987-8277
David B BullerKlein Buendel, Inc., Golden, CO, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7902-9129
University of New Mexico · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USKlein Buendel (United States) · USThe Center for Mind-Body Medicine · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
WOMEN'S CANCERS RESEARCH PROGRAMP30CA118100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI Yolanda Sanchez · 2005 to 2026
$57.1M
Psychosocial Palliative & Community Research in CancerT32CA009461 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JENNIFER L HAY, Jamie S. Ostroff · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
Personalized Genomic Testing for Melanoma: Maximizing Personal Utility and ReachR01CA181241 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BERWICK, MARIANNE, HAY, JENNIFER L · 2014 to 2016
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA118100NCI NIH HHS R01 CA181241NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLimited translational genomic research currently exists to guide the availability, comprehension, and appropriate use of personalized genomics in diverse general population subgroups. Melanoma skin cancers are preventable, curable, common in the general population, and disproportionately increasing in Hispanics.

objectiveVariants in the melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) gene are present in approximately 50% of the population, are major factors in determining sun sensitivity, and confer a 2-to-3-fold increase in melanoma risk in the general population, even in populations with darker skin. Therefore, feedback regarding MC1R risk status may raise risk awareness and protective behavior in the general population.

methodsWe are conducting a randomized controlled trial examining Internet presentation of the risks and benefits of personalized genomic testing for MC1R gene variants that are associated with increased melanoma risk. We will enroll a total of 885 participants (462 participants are currently enrolled), who will be randomized 6:1 to personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk versus waiting list control. Control participants will be offered testing after outcome assessments. Participants will be balanced across self-reported Hispanic versus non-Hispanic ethnicity (n=750 in personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk arm; n=135 in control arm), and will be recruited from a general population cohort in Albuquerque, New Mexico, which is subject to year-round sun exposure. Baseline surveys will be completed in-person with study staff and follow-up measures will be completed via telephone.

resultsAim 1 of the trial will examine the personal utility of personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk in terms of short-term (3-month) sun protection and skin screening behaviors, family and physician communication, and melanoma threat and control beliefs (ie, putative mediators of behavior change). We will also examine potential unintended consequences of testing among those who receive average-risk personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk findings, and examine predictors of sun protection at 3 months as the outcome. These findings will be used to develop messages for groups that receive average-risk feedback. Aim 2 will compare rates of test consideration in Hispanics versus non-Hispanics, including consideration of testing pros and cons and registration of a decision to either accept or decline testing. Aim 3 will examine personalized genomic testing for melanoma risk feedback comprehension, recall, satisfaction, and cancer-related distress in those who undergo testing, and whether these outcomes differ by ethnicity (Hispanic vs non-Hispanic), or sociocultural or demographic factors. Final outcome data collection is anticipated to be complete by October 2017, at which point data analysis will commence.

conclusionsThis study has important implications for personalized genomics in the context of melanoma risk, and may be broadly applicable as a model for delivery of personalized genomic feedback for other health conditions.

Indexed as

genetic risk communicationgenetic testingmelanoma preventiononline health educationprimary careskin cancer risk

Identifiers

PMID28442450
PMCPMC5424125
OpenAlexW2607567538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.