Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28442297›Full record

ArticleBone2017

Vertebral and femoral bone mineral density and bone strength in prostate cancer patients assessed in phantomless PET/CT examinations.

Benedikt J Schwaiger, David L Kopperdahl, Lorenzo Nardo, Luca Facchetti, Alexandra S Gersing, Jan Neumann, Kwang J Lee, Tony M Keaveny, Thomas M Link

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biomechanical Computed Tomography analysis (BCT) for clinical assessment of osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Cost-Effectiveness of Osteoporosis Screening Using Biomechanical Computed Tomography for Patients With a Previous Abdominal CT.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2019
    Article
  17. Opportunistic osteoporosis screening in multi-detector CT images via local classification of textures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Osteoporosis and Hip Fracture Risk From Routine Computed Tomography Scans: The Fracture, Osteoporosis, and CT Utilization Study (FOCUS).Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Benedikt J SchwaigerDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: bschwaiger@gmx.com.
David L KopperdahlO.N. Diagnostics, LLC, Berkeley, CA, United States. Electronic address: david.kopperdahl@ondiagnostics.com.
Lorenzo NardoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: lornardob@gmail.com.
Luca FacchettiDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Alexandra S GersingDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: alexandra.gersing@ucsf.edu.
Jan NeumannDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: jan.neumann@ucsf.edu.
Kwang J LeeO.N. Diagnostics, LLC, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Tony M KeavenyDepartments of Mechanical Engineering and Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, United States. Electronic address: tonykeaveny@berkeley.edu.
Thomas M LinkDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: thomas.link@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USO.N. Diagnostics (United States) · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Robust BCT for Clinical Use - Phase IIR44AR057616 · NIAMS · O. N. DIAGNOSTICS, LLC · PI KOPPERDAHL, DAVID · 2014 to 2016
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R44 AR057616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBone fracture risk assessed ancillary to positron emission tomography with computed tomography co-registration (PET/CT) could provide substantial clinical value to oncology patients with elevated fracture risk without introducing additional radiation dose. The purpose of our study was to investigate the feasibility of obtaining valid measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) and finite element analysis-derived bone strength of the hip and spine using PET/CT examinations of prostate cancer patients by comparing against values obtained using routine multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) scans-as validated in previous studies-as a reference standard. MATERIALS AND

methodsMen with prostate cancer (n=82, 71.6±8.3 years) underwent Fluorine-18 NaF PET/CT and routine MDCT within three months. Femoral neck and total hip areal BMD, vertebral trabecular BMD and femur and vertebral strength based on finite element analysis were assessed in 63 paired PET/CT and MDCT examinations using phantomless calibration and Biomechanical-CT analysis. Men with osteoporosis or fragile bone strength identified at either the hip or spine (vertebral trabecular BMD ≤80mg/cm

resultsAll measurements from PET/CT versus MDCT were strongly correlated (R

conclusionAncillary analyses of BMD, bone strength, and fracture risk agreed well between PET/CT and MDCT, suggesting that PET/CT can be used opportunistically to comprehensively assess bone integrity. In subjects with high fracture risk such as cancer patients this may serve as an additional clinical tool to guide therapy planning and prevention of fractures.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaBone DensityFemur NeckFinite Element AnalysisHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoporosisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic Neoplasms18F-NaF PET/CTBiomechanical-CTBone mineral densityBone strengthCancer-induced bone diseaseFinite element analysisMDCTProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28442297
PMCPMC5506071
OpenAlexW2608401032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.